Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul;147(4):209-32.
doi: 10.1177/1715163514536678.

Paying pharmacists for patient care: A systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services

Affiliations
Review

Paying pharmacists for patient care: A systematic review of remunerated pharmacy clinical care services

Sherilyn K D Houle et al. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Expansion of scope of practice and diminishing revenues from dispensing are requiring pharmacists to increasingly adopt clinical care services into their practices. Pharmacists must be able to receive payment in order for provision of clinical care to be sustainable. The objective of this study is to update a previous systematic review by identifying remunerated pharmacist clinical care programs worldwide and reporting on uptake and patient care outcomes observed as a result.

Methods: Literature searches were performed in several databases, including MEDLINE, Embase and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, for papers referencing remuneration, pharmacy and cognitive services. Searches of the grey literature and Internet were also conducted. Papers and programs were identified up to December 2012 and were included if they were not reported in our previous review. One author performed data abstraction, which was independently reviewed by a second author. All results are presented descriptively.

Results: Sixty new remunerated programs were identified across Canada, the United States, Europe, Australia and New Zealand, ranging in complexity from emergency contraception counseling to minor ailments schemes and comprehensive medication management. In North America, the average fee provided for a medication review is $68.86 (all figures are given in Canadian dollars), with $23.37 offered for a follow-up visit and $15.16 for prescription adaptations. Time-dependent fees were reimbursed at $93.60 per hour on average. Few programs evaluated uptake and outcomes of these services but, when available, indicated slow uptake but improved chronic disease markers and cost savings.

Discussion: Remuneration for pharmacists' clinical care services is highly variable, with few programs reporting program outcomes. Programs and pharmacists are encouraged to examine the time required to perform these activities and the outcomes achieved to ensure that fees are adequate to sustain these patient care activities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Dr. Tsuyuki did not participate in the peer review of this article.

References

    1. Hepler CD, Strand LM. Opportunities and responsibilities in pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1990;47:533-43. - PubMed
    1. Canadian Pharmacists Association. Blueprint for Pharmacy—Implementation Plan. Available: http://blueprintforpharmacy.ca/docs/pdfs/blueprint-implementation-plan_f... (accessed December 5, 2012).
    1. Mah E, Rosenthal M, Tsuyuki RT. Study of understanding pharmacists’ perspectives on remuneration and transition toward chronic disease management (SUPPORT-CDM): results of an Alberta-wide survey of community pharmacists. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2009;142:136-44.
    1. Roberts AS, Benrimoj SI, Chen TF, et al. Implementing cognitive services in community pharmacy: a review of faciliators used in practice change. Int J Pharm Pract 2006;14:163-70.
    1. Santschi V, Chiolero A, Burnand B, et al. Impact of pharmacist care in the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:1441-53. - PubMed