Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e111499.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111499. eCollection 2014.

Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of the operative outcomes and learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Kuo-Hung Huang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surgery, including laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy, has become more popular in the treatment of gastric cancer. However, few studies have compared the learning curves between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods: Data were prospectively collected between July 2008 and Aug 2014. A total of 145 patients underwent minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer by a single surgeon, including 73 laparoscopic and 72 robotic gastrectomies. The clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes and learning curves were compared between the two groups.

Results: Compared with the laparoscopic group, the robotic group was associated with less blood loss and longer operative time. After the surgeon learning curves were overcome for each technique, the operative outcomes became similar between the two groups except longer operative time in the robotic group. After accumulating more cases of robotic gastrectomy, the operative time in the laparoscopic group decreased dramatically.

Conclusions: After overcoming the learning curves, the operative outcomes became similar between laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy. The experience of robotic gastrectomy could affect the learning process of laparoscopic gastrectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The operative time of laparoscopic and robotic gastrectomy decreased significantly after the learning curves.
(A) The operative time of laparoscopic gastrectomy decreased after the 41th case. The arrows show the case number of robotic gastrectomy (RG) performed at the corresponding time of laparoscopic gastrectomy. (B) The operative time and docking time of robotic gastrectomy decreased after the 25th case.

References

    1. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Uyama I, Sugihara K, Tanigawa N, et al. (2007) A multicenter study on oncologic outcome of laparoscopic gastrectomy for early cancer in Japan. Ann Surg 245: 68–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 241: 232–237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Lee CM, Son SY, Ahn SH, Park do J, et al. (2014) Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: long-term oncologic results. Surgery 155: 154–64. - PubMed
    1. Park SS, Kim MC, Park MS, Hyung WJ (2012) Rapid adaptation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 26: 60–67. - PubMed
    1. Kim HI, Park MS, Song KJ, Woo Y, Hyung WJ (2013) Rapid and safe learning of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Multidimensional analysis in a comparison with laparoscopic gastrectomy. Eur J Surg Oncol [Epub ahead of print]. - PubMed

Publication types