Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 23:9:23934.
doi: 10.3402/qhw.v9.23934. eCollection 2014.

Prerequisites for sustainable care improvement using the reflective team as a work model

Lise-Lotte Jonasson  1 , Gunilla Carlsson  2 , Maria Nyström  2
Affiliations

Prerequisites for sustainable care improvement using the reflective team as a work model

Lise-Lotte Jonasson et al. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. .

Abstract

Several work models for care improvement have been developed in order to meet the requirement for evidence-based care. This study examines a work model for reflection, entitled the reflective team (RT). The main idea behind RTs is that caring skills exist among those who work closest to the patients. The team leader (RTL) encourages sustainable care improvement, rooted in research and proven experience, by using a lifeworld perspective to stimulate further reflection and a developmental process leading to research-based caring actions within the team. In order to maintain focus, it is important that the RTL has a clear idea of what sustainable care improvement means, and what the prerequisites are for such improvement. The aim of the present study is, therefore, to explore the prerequisites for improving sustainable care, seeking to answer how RTLs perceive these and use RTs for concrete planning. Nine RTLs were interviewed, and their statements were phenomenographically analysed. The analysis revealed three separate qualitative categories, which describe personal, interpersonal, and structural aspects of the prerequisites. In the discussion, these categories are compared with previous research on reflection, and the conclusion is reached that the optimal conditions for RTs to work, when focussed on sustainable care improvement, occur when the various aspects of the prerequisites are intertwined and become a natural part of the reflective work.

Keywords: Reflective team; care improvement; lifeworld; phenomenography; phenomenon; sustainability.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aitken L. M, Hackwood B, Crouch S, Clayton S, West N, Carney D, et al. Creating an environment to implement and sustain evidence in practice: A developmental process. Australian Critical Care. 2011;24:244–254. - PubMed
    1. Andersen T. The reflecting team: Dialogue and meta-dialogue in clinical work. Family Process. 1987;26(4):415–428. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.1987.00415.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Andersson J, Åhgren B, Bihari Axelsson S, Eriksson A, Axelsson R. Organizational approaches to collaboration in vocational rehabilitation – An international literature review. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2011;11:137. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Batalden P, Davidoff F. What is “quality improvement” and how can it transform healthcare? Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2007;16:2–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berlin J. Synchronous work – Myth or reality? – A critical study of teams in health and medical care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2010;16(4):1314–1321. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources