Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar;115(3):471-82.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-014-3032-5. Epub 2014 Nov 1.

Modulation of exercise-induced spinal loop properties in response to oxygen availability

Affiliations

Modulation of exercise-induced spinal loop properties in response to oxygen availability

Thomas Rupp et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of acute hypoxia on spinal reflexes and soleus muscle function after a sustained contraction of the plantar flexors at 40% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC). Fifteen males (age 25.3 ± 0.9 year) performed the fatigue task at two different inspired O₂ fractions (FiO₂ = 0.21/0.11) in a randomized and single-blind fashion. Before, at task failure and after 6, 12 and 18 min of passive recovery, the Hoffman-reflex (H max) and M-wave (M max) were recorded at rest and voluntary activation (VA), surface electromyogram (RMSmax), M-wave (M sup) and V-wave (V sup) were recorded during MVC. Normalized H-reflex (H max/M max) was significantly depressed pre-exercise in hypoxia compared with normoxia (0.31 ± 0.08 and 0.36 ± 0.08, respectively, P < 0.05). Hypoxia did not affect time to task failure (mean time of 453.9 ± 32.0 s) and MVC decrease at task failure (-18% in normoxia vs. -16% in hypoxia). At task failure, VA (-8%), RMSmax/M sup (-11%), H max/M max (-27%) and V sup/M sup (-37%) decreased (P < 0.05), but with no FiO2 effect. H max/M max restored significantly throughout recovery in hypoxia but not in normoxia, while V sup/M sup restored significantly during recovery in normoxia but not in hypoxia (P < 0.05). Collectively, these findings indicate that central adaptations resulting from sustained submaximal fatiguing contraction were not different in hypoxia and normoxia at task failure. However, the FiO₂-induced differences in spinal loop properties pre-exercise and throughout recovery suggest possible specific mediation by the hypoxic-sensitive group III and IV muscle afferents, supraspinal regulation mechanisms being mainly involved in hypoxia while spinal ones may be predominant in normoxia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Physiol. 1996 Feb 15;491 ( Pt 1):271-80 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Aug;63(2):639-45 - PubMed
    1. Clin Sci (Lond). 2000 Mar;98 (3):329-37 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1939 Nov 14;97(1):17-31 - PubMed
    1. Exp Brain Res. 1996 Mar;108(3):450-62 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources