Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;22(3):824-32.
doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0728-9.

The effect of decreased interletter spacing on orthographic processing

Affiliations

The effect of decreased interletter spacing on orthographic processing

Veronica Montani et al. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

There is growing interest in how perceptual factors such as the spacing between letters within words modulate performance in visual word recognition and reading aloud. Extra-large letter spacing can strongly improve the reading performance of dyslexic children, and a small increase with respect to the standard spacing seems beneficial even for skilled word recognition in adult readers. In the present study we examined the effect of decreased letter spacing on perceptual identification and lexical decision tasks. Identification in the decreased spacing condition was slower than identification of normally spaced strings, thereby confirming that the reciprocal interference among letters located in close proximity (crowding) poses critical constraints on visual word processing. Importantly, the effect of spacing was not modulated by string length, suggesting that the locus of the spacing effect is at the level of letter detectors. Moreover, the processing of crowded letters was facilitated by top-down support from orthographic lexical representation as indicated by the fact that decreased spacing affected pseudowords significantly more than words. Conversely, in the lexical decision task only word responses were affected by the spacing manipulation. Overall, our findings support the hypothesis that increased crowding is particularly harmful for phonological decoding, thereby adversely affecting reading development in dyslexic children.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nature. 1970 Apr 11;226(5241):177-8 - PubMed
    1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):306-11 - PubMed
    1. Vision Res. 2001 Mar;41(6):725-43 - PubMed
    1. Nat Neurosci. 2008 Oct;11(10):1129-35 - PubMed
    1. J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3): - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources