ADReCS: an ontology database for aiding standardization and hierarchical classification of adverse drug reaction terms
- PMID: 25361966
- PMCID: PMC4383906
- DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku1066
ADReCS: an ontology database for aiding standardization and hierarchical classification of adverse drug reaction terms
Abstract
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are noxious and unexpected effects during normal drug therapy. They have caused significant clinical burden and been responsible for a large portion of new drug development failure. Molecular understanding and in silico evaluation of drug (or candidate) safety in laboratory is thus so desired, and unfortunately has been largely hindered by misuse of ADR terms. The growing impact of bioinformatics and systems biology in toxicological research also requires a specialized ADR term system that works beyond a simple glossary. Adverse Drug Reaction Classification System (ADReCS; http://bioinf.xmu.edu.cn/ADReCS) is a comprehensive ADR ontology database that provides not only ADR standardization but also hierarchical classification of ADR terms. The ADR terms were pre-assigned with unique digital IDs and at the same time were well organized into a four-level ADR hierarchy tree for building an ADR-ADR relation. Currently, the database covers 6544 standard ADR terms and 34,796 synonyms. It also incorporates information of 1355 single active ingredient drugs and 134,022 drug-ADR pairs. In summary, ADReCS offers an opportunity for direct computation on ADR terms and also provides clues to mining common features underlying ADRs.
© The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.
Figures



References
-
- WHO. Safety of Medicines: A guide to detecting and reporting adverse drug reactions. World Health Organization. 2002 WHO/EDM/QSM/2002.2.
-
- Giacomini K.M., Krauss R.M., Roden D.M., Eichelbaum M., Hayden M.R., Nakamura Y. When good drugs go bad. Nature. 2007;446:975–977. - PubMed
-
- Kavitha D. Adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring and pharmacovigilance. Asian J. Pharm. Res. Health Care. 2010;2:127–134.
-
- Arrowsmith J., Miller P. Trial watch: phase II and phase III attrition rates 2011–2012. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013;12:569. - PubMed
-
- Paludetto M.N., Olivier-Abbal P., Montastruc J.L. Is spontaneous reporting always the most important information supporting drug withdrawals for pharmacovigilance reasons in France. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2012;21:1289–1294. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials