Comparative efficacy of different acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke: a comprehensive benefit-risk analysis of clinical trials
- PMID: 25365799
- PMCID: PMC4178251
- DOI: 10.1002/brb3.279
Comparative efficacy of different acute reperfusion therapies for acute ischemic stroke: a comprehensive benefit-risk analysis of clinical trials
Abstract
Background: Numerous acute reperfusion therapies (RPT) are currently investigated as potential new therapeutic targets in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We conducted a comprehensive benefit-risk analysis of available clinical studies assessing different acute RPT, and investigated the utility of each intervention in comparison to standard intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and in relation to the onset-to-treatment time (OTT).
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify all available published, peer-reviewed clinical studies that evaluated the efficacy of different RPT in AIS. Benefit-to-risk ratio (BRR), adjusted for baseline stroke severity, was estimated as the percentage of patients achieving favorable functional outcome (BRR1, mRS score: 0-1) or functional independence (BRR2, mRS score: 0-2) at 3 months divided by the percentage of patients who died during the same period.
Results: A total of 18 randomized (n = 13) and nonrandomized (n = 5) clinical studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria. IV therapy with tenecteplase (TNK) was found to have the highest BRRs (BRR1 = 5.76 and BRR2 = 6.82 for low-dose TNK; BRR1 = 5.80 and BRR2 = 6.87 for high-dose TNK), followed by sonothrombolysis (BRR1 = 2.75 and BRR2 = 3.38), while endovascular thrombectomy with MERCI retriever was found to have the lowest BRRs (BRR1 range, 0.31-0.65; BRR2 range, 0.52-1.18). A second degree negative polynomial correlation was detected between favorable functional outcome and OTT (R (2) value: 0.6419; P < 0.00001) indicating the time dependency of clinical efficacy of all reperfusion therapies.
Conclusion: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with TNK and sonothrombolysis have the higher BRR among investigational reperfusion therapies. The combination of sonothrombolysis with IV administration of TNK appears a potentially promising therapeutic option deserving further investigation.
Keywords: Acute stroke; analysis; benefit-to-risk ratio; reperfusion therapies.
Figures
References
-
- Alexandrov AV. Current and future recanalization strategies for acute ischemic stroke. J. Intern. Med. 2010;267:209–219. - PubMed
-
- Alexandrov AV, Barlinn K. Taboos and opportunities in sonothrombolysis for stroke. Int. J. Hyperthermia. 2012;28:397–404. - PubMed
-
- Alexandrov AV, Molina CA, Grotta JC, Garami Z, Ford SR, Alvarez-Sabin J, et al. Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004;351:2170–2178. - PubMed
-
- Balami JS, Chen R, Sutherland BA, Buchan AM. Thrombolytic agents for acute ischaemic stroke treatment: the past, present and future. CNS Neurol. Disord. Drug Targets. 2013;12:145–154. - PubMed
-
- Barlinn K, Alexandrov AV. Sonothrombolysis in ischemic stroke. Curr. Treat Options Neurol. 2013;15:91–103. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
