Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Jul;16(5):652-62.
doi: 10.1007/s11121-014-0524-9.

Effects of the communities that care prevention system on youth reports of protective factors

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effects of the communities that care prevention system on youth reports of protective factors

B K Elizabeth Kim et al. Prev Sci. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Many interventions seeking to reduce problem behaviors and promote healthy youth development target both risk and protective factors, yet few studies have examined the effect of preventive interventions on overall levels of protection community wide. In a community-randomized controlled trial, this study tested the effect of Communities That Care (CTC) on protective factors in 24 communities across seven states. Data on protective factors were collected from a panel of 4407 youths in CTC and control communities followed from grade 5 through grade 8. Hierarchical linear modeling compared mean levels of 15 protective factors derived from the social development model in CTC and control communities in grade 8, adjusted for individual and community characteristics and baseline levels of protective factors in grade 5. Global test statistics were calculated to examine effects on protection overall and by domain. Analyses across all protective factors found significantly higher levels of overall protection in CTC compared to control communities. Analyses by domain found significantly higher levels of protection in CTC than control communities in the community, school, and peer/individual domains, but not in the family domain. Significantly higher levels of opportunities for prosocial involvement in the community, recognition for prosocial involvement in school, interaction with prosocial peers, and social skills among CTC compared to control youth contributed to the overall and domain-specific results. This is consistent with CTC's theory of change, which posits that strengthening protective factors is a mechanism through which CTC prevents behavior problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT Flow Diagram
Figure 2
Figure 2
Adjusted difference in mean levels of eighth-grade protective factors comparing CTC to control communities.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Akers RL. Deviant behavior: A social learning approach. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1977.
    1. Arthur MW, Ayers CD, Graham KA, Hawkins JD. Mobilizing communities to reduce risks for drug abuse: A comparison of two strategies. In: Bukoski WJ, Sloboda Z, editors. Handbook of drug abuse prevention. Theory, science and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2003. pp. 129–144.
    1. Arthur MW, Glaser RR, Hawkins JD. Steps towards community-level resilience: Community adoption of science-based prevention programming. In: Peters RD, Leadbeater B, McMahon RJ, editors. Resilience in children, families, and communities: Linking context to practice and policy. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2005. pp. 177–194.
    1. Arthur MW, Hawkins JD, Pollard JA, Catalano RF, Baglioni AJ., Jr Measuring risk and protective factors for substance use, delinquency, and other adolescent problem behaviors: The Communities That Care Youth Survey. Evaluation Review. 2002;26:575–601. - PubMed
    1. Bowers EP, von Eye A, Lerner JV, Arbeit MR, Weiner MB, Chase P, Agans JP. The role of ecological assets in positive and problematic developmental trajectories. Journal of Adolescence. 2011;34:1151–1165. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms