The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement: a focus group study in English general practice
- PMID: 25366992
- PMCID: PMC5810660
- DOI: 10.1111/hex.12298
The role of patient experience surveys in quality assurance and improvement: a focus group study in English general practice
Abstract
Background: Despite widespread adoption of patient feedback surveys in international health-care systems, including the English NHS, evidence of a demonstrable impact of surveys on service improvement is sparse.
Objective: To explore the views of primary care practice staff regarding the utility of patient experience surveys.
Design: Qualitative focus groups.
Setting and participants: Staff from 14 English general practices.
Results: Whilst participants engaged with feedback from patient experience surveys, they routinely questioned its validity and reliability. Participants identified surveys as having a number of useful functions: for patients, as a potentially therapeutic way of getting their voice heard; for practice staff, as a way of identifying areas of improvement; and for GPs, as a source of evidence for professional development and appraisal. Areas of potential change stimulated by survey feedback included redesigning front-line services, managing patient expectations and managing the performance of GPs. Despite this, practice staff struggled to identify and action changes based on survey feedback alone.
Discussion: Whilst surveys may be used to endorse existing high-quality service delivery, their use in informing changes in service delivery is more challenging for practice staff. Drawing on the Utility Index framework, we identified concerns relating to reliability and validity, cost and feasibility acceptability and educational impact, which combine to limit the utility of patient survey feedback.
Conclusions: Feedback from patient experience surveys has great potential. However, without a specific and renewed focus on how to translate feedback into action, this potential will remain incompletely realized.
Keywords: patient experience; primary care; qualitative research; quality improvement.
© 2014 The Authors Health Expectations Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803. Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024. PMID: 39324475 Review.
-
The Friends and Family Test in general practice in England: a qualitative study of the views of staff and patients.Br J Gen Pract. 2017 May;67(658):e370-e376. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X690617. Br J Gen Pract. 2017. PMID: 28450345 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges to the credibility of patient feedback in primary healthcare settings: a qualitative study.Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Mar;63(608):e200-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X664252. Br J Gen Pract. 2013. PMID: 23561787 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing a survey for patients to provide safety experience feedback following a care transition: a feasibility study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 30;19(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4447-9. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 31470853 Free PMC article.
-
Improving patient experience in primary care: a multimethod programme of research on the measurement and improvement of patient experience.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Apr. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2017 Apr. PMID: 28654227 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Rating Communication in GP Consultations: The Association Between Ratings Made by Patients and Trained Clinical Raters.Med Care Res Rev. 2018 Apr;75(2):201-218. doi: 10.1177/1077558716671217. Epub 2016 Oct 3. Med Care Res Rev. 2018. PMID: 27698072 Free PMC article.
-
The Evaluation of Physicians' Communication Skills From Multiple Perspectives.Ann Fam Med. 2018 Jul;16(4):330-337. doi: 10.1370/afm.2241. Ann Fam Med. 2018. PMID: 29987081 Free PMC article.
-
Reflection in practice: How can patient experience feedback trigger staff reflection in hospital acute care settings?Health Expect. 2020 Apr;23(2):396-404. doi: 10.1111/hex.13010. Epub 2019 Dec 19. Health Expect. 2020. PMID: 31858677 Free PMC article.
-
How do aggregated patient-reported outcome measures data stimulate health care improvement? A realist synthesis.J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jan;23(1):57-65. doi: 10.1177/1355819617740925. Epub 2017 Dec 20. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018. PMID: 29260592 Free PMC article.
-
Feedback reports to the general practitioner (GP) on the patients' experiences: are GPs interested, and is this interest associated with GP factors and patient experience scores?Fam Pract. 2023 Dec 22;40(5-6):682-688. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmad019. Fam Pract. 2023. PMID: 36856813 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Department of Health . NHS Patient Experience Framework. London: Department of Health, 2012. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-patient-experience-framework, accessed 2 July 2014.
-
- NICE . Patient Experience in Adult NHS Services. NICE Quality Standards [QS15]. London: NICE, 2012. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/QS15, accessed 2 July 2014.
-
- Darzi A. High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. London: Department of Health, 2008. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/fil..., accessed 2 July 2014.
-
- Ahmed F, Burt J, Roland M. Measuring patient experience: concepts and methods. The Patient – Patient‐Centered Outcomes Research, 2014; 7: 235–241. - PubMed
-
- Contandriopoulos D, Champagne F, Denis J‐L. The multiple causal pathways between performance measures’ use and effects. Medical Care Research and Review, 2014; 71: 3–20. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources