Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Oct 24:6:147-58.
doi: 10.2147/HIV.S46585. eCollection 2014.

Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis

Affiliations
Review

Current perspectives in HIV post-exposure prophylaxis

Binta Sultan et al. HIV AIDS (Auckl). .

Abstract

The incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection continues to rise among core groups and efforts to reduce the numbers of new infections are being redoubled. Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) is the use of short-term antiretroviral therapy (ART) to reduce the risk of acquisition of HIV infection following exposure. Current guidelines recommend a 28-day course of ART within 36-72 hours of exposure to HIV. As long as individuals continue to be exposed to HIV there will be a role for PEP in the foreseeable future. Nonoccupational PEP, the vast majority of which is for sexual exposure (PEPSE), has a significant role to play in HIV prevention efforts. Awareness of PEP and its availability for both clinicians and those who are eligible to receive it are crucial to ensure that PEP is used to its full potential in any HIV prevention strategy. In this review, we provide current evidence for the use of PEPSE, assessment of the risk of HIV transmission, indications for PEP, drug regimens, and management of patients started on PEP. We summarize national and international guidelines for the use of PEPSE. We explore the place of PEP within the wider strategy of reducing HIV incidence rates in the era of treatment as prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis. We also consider the implications of recent data from interventional and observational studies demonstrating significant reductions in the risk of HIV transmission within a serodiscordant relationship if the HIV-positive partner is taking effective ART upon PEP guidelines.

Keywords: human immunodeficiency virus; post-exposure prophylaxis; pre-exposure prophylaxis; treatment as prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Joint United Nations . Global report: UNAIDS report on the global AIDS epidemic 2013. Geneva, Switzerland: UNAIDS; 2013. [Accessed December 26, 2013]. Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) Available from: http://www.unaids.org/en/media/unaids/contentassets/documents/epidemiolo....
    1. Pinto LA, Landay AL, Berzofsky JA, Kessler HA, Shearer GM. Immune response to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in health care workers occupationally exposed to HIV-contaminated blood. Am J Med. 1997;102(5B):21–24. - PubMed
    1. Spira AI, Marx PA, Patterson BK, et al. Cellular targets of infection and route of viral dissemination after an intravaginal inoculation of simian immunodeficiency virus into rhesus macaques. J Exp Med. 1996;183(1):215–225. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Valcour V, Chalermchai T, Sailasuta N, et al. RV254/SEARCH 010 Study Group Central nervous system viral invasion and inflammation during acute HIV infection. J Infect Dis. 2012;206(2):275–282. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller RJ, Cairns JS, Bridges S, Sarver N. Human immunodeficiency virus and AIDS: insights from animal lentiviruses. J Virol. 2000;74(16):7187–7195. - PMC - PubMed