Vision in a phase 3 trial of natalizumab for multiple sclerosis: relation to disability and quality of life

Abstract

Background: Low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA), a sensitive measure of visual function in multiple sclerosis (MS), demonstrated treatment effects as a secondary outcome measure in the Phase 3 trial of natalizumab, AFFIRM. In these posttrial analyses, we studied the relation of visual function to quality of life (QOL), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures, and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores.

Methods: At baseline and at 52 and 104 weeks in AFFIRM, patients underwent binocular testing of LCVA (1.25% and 2.5% contrast) and high-contrast visual acuity (HCVA). Vision-specific QOL was assessed by the Impact of Visual Impairment Scale (IVIS), whereas the SF-36 Health Survey and Visual Analog Scale were administered as generic QOL measures and the EDSS as a measure of neurologic impairment.

Results: Among QOL measures, IVIS scores showed the most significant correlations with visual dysfunction at all time points in the trial (r= -0.25 to -0.45, P < 0.0001 for LCVA and HCVA). Higher MRI T1- and T2-lesion volumes were also associated with worse vision scores at all time points (P < 0.0001). Clinically meaningful worsening (progression) of LCVA was noted in substantial proportions of patients in AFFIRM and was prevalent even among those without EDSS progression over 2 years (21.9% with LCVA progression at 2.5% contrast; 26.2% at 1.25% contrast). HCVA worsened in only 3.7% of patients without EDSS progression.

Conclusions: Loss of visual function, particularly as measured by LCVA, was common in AFFIRM, occurring in >20% of patients. Both LCVA and HCVA scores reflect vision-specific aspects of QOL, but LCVA provides information about disability progression not entirely captured by the EDSS. Vision represents a key dimension of outcome assessment for MS and adds valuable information on disability and QOL that can be useful to clinicians.

FIG. 1

Proportions of patients with worsening vision by EDSS progression status over 2 years. Using 7-letter criterion for clinically meaningful visual change, a significantly greater number of patients with EDSS progression had worsening in HCVA compared with those with no EDSS progression. Notably, there were no significant differences in LCVA worsening between patients with and without EDSS progression. P values are from McNemar's test. EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale; HCVA, high-contrast visual acuity; LCVA, low-contrast visual acuity; VFT, visual function testing.