Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Nov 5:14:1147.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1147.

Provision of chlamydia testing, and training of primary health care staff about chlamydia testing, across four European countries

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Provision of chlamydia testing, and training of primary health care staff about chlamydia testing, across four European countries

Anneli Uusküla et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The objectives of this study were to describe and compare chlamydia testing provided by general practitioners (GPs) in four selected European countries with well-developed primary health care systems and high reported chlamydia rates; we aimed to compare contrasting countries where chlamydia testing is provided by GPs (England, Sweden) with countries where primary care chlamydia testing is absent or very limited (France, Estonia).

Methods: For data generation a structured questionnaire was developed and secondary data sources were searched. The questionnaire developed by the research team allowed a systematic approach to analysing chlamydia care (including testing in general practice) and the gathering of relevant data.

Results: There were no significant differences in the burden of the disease or the type of general practice care provision in the study countries. In all four countries, testing for chlamydia (with nucleic acid amplification test, NAAT) is available in the public sector, a substantial proportion (>60%) of young people aged 16-25 years visit their general practitioner (GP) annually, and reimbursement for chlamydia testing costs to the relevant parties (GPs in England, Sweden and Estonia; and patients in France) by the national health insurance system or its equivalent.In countries where chlamydia testing is provided by GPs (England, Sweden) a national strategy or plan on STI control that specifically mentions chlamydia was in force, chlamydia care guidelines for GPs were in place and STI management was more firmly established in the GP residency training curriculum, either formally (England) or informally (Sweden), than in the other countries.

Conclusion: Future research on the effectiveness of chlamydia screening (also in the context of general practice care) and program provision should reflect national needs and the prevention of complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . Annual epidemiological report Reporting on 2010 surveillance data and 2011 epidemic intelligence data. Stockholm: ECDC; 2012.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2010. Atlanta: U.S : Department of Health and Human Services; 2011.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention . (Draft) technical report: Chlamydia Control in Europe Survey of Member States. Stockholm: ECDC; 2013.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control . GUIDANCE Chlamydia control in Europe. Stockholm: ECDC; 2009.
    1. Shaw K, Coleman D, O’Sullivan M, Stephens N. Public health policies and management strategies for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Risk Manage Healthc Policy. 2011;4:57–65. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S12710. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1147/prepub

Publication types