Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;21(3):186-92.
doi: 10.4103/2230-8229.142974.

Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Saulat Jahan  1 , Abdullah M Al-Saigul  1 , Ali M Alharbi  2 , Muzamil H Abdelgadir  3
Affiliations

Suitability assessment of health education brochures in Qassim province, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Saulat Jahan et al. J Family Community Med. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Health education is the cornerstone of primary health care. Health education materials distributed to the community should, therefore, be suitable and effective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the health education brochures, designed and disseminated by Ministry of Health institutions in the Qassim province.

Materials and methods: The study was a cross-sectional review of health education brochures. We used a structured evaluation form, comprising general information on the brochures and a modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) score sheet. The SAM consisting of 22 criteria in six groups, includes content, literacy demands, graphics, layout/typography, learning stimulation/motivation, and cultural appropriateness. SAM criteria categorize written material into "superior," "adequate" and "not suitable." Two qualified consultant family physicians evaluated the brochures. Data were analyzed using Epi Info version 3.4 statistical package.

Results: We evaluated 110 brochures, the majority of which addressed chronic health conditions such as mental health, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Seventy-four (67.3%) brochures were evaluated as "adequate," 34 (30.9%) as "not suitable" and 2 (1.8%) as "superior." "Cultural appropriateness" was the highest scoring factor, with 92 (83.6%) brochures falling into either the "superior" or "adequate" category. With regard to "content," 88 (80.0%) brochures fell into either the "superior" or "adequate" category. This was the second highest scoring factor. Graphics was the factor that scored the least. Seventy-five (68.2%) brochures were rated in this factor as "not suitable."

Conclusions: Although two-thirds of our brochures were considered "adequate," the majority needed improvement to their graphics and learning stimulation factors. We recommend that guidelines for designing health education brochures should be formulated to improve the quality of health education brochures.

Keywords: Brochure; Qassim; Saudi Arabia; health education; suitability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Suitability rating of the health education brochures in Qassim (n = 110)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eckman MH, Wise R, Leonard AC, Dixon E, Burrows C, Khan F, et al. Impact of health literacy on outcomes and effectiveness of an educational intervention in patients with chronic diseases. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:143–51. - PubMed
    1. Paul S. Hospital discharge education for patients with heart failure: What really works and what is the evidence? Crit Care Nurse. 2008;28:66–82. - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann T, Ladner Y. Assessing the suitability of written stroke materials: An evaluation of the interrater reliability of the suitability assessment of materials (SAM) checklist. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19:417–22. - PubMed
    1. McPherson CJ, Higginson IJ, Hearn J. Effective methods of giving information in cancer: A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials. J Public Health Med. 2001;23:227–34. - PubMed
    1. Owen J, Kohne J, Douglas L, Hewitson T, Baldwin R. An implementation pathway for matching education material with the literacy level of dialysis patients. Ren Soc Australas J. 2009;5:133–7.