Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 4;3(4):74-9.
doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i4.74.

Intensive care performance: How should we monitor performance in the future?

Affiliations

Intensive care performance: How should we monitor performance in the future?

Tim K Timmers et al. World J Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Intensive care faces economic challenges. Therefore, evidence proving both effectiveness and efficiency, i.e., cost-effectiveness, of delivered care is needed. Today, the quality of care is an important issue in the health care debate. How do we measure quality of care and how accurate and representative is this measurement? In the following report, several topics which are used for the evaluation of intensive care unit (ICU) performance are discussed: (1) The use of general outcome prediction models to determine the risk of patients who are admitted to ICUs in an increasing variety of case mix for the different intensive care units, together with three major limitations; (2) As critical care outcomes research becomes a more established entity, mortality is now only one of many endpoints that are relevant. Mortality is a limited outcome when assessing critical care performance, while patient interest in quality of life outcomes is relevant; and (3) The Quality Indicators Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine recommended that short-term readmission is a major performance indicator of the quality of intensive care medicine.

Keywords: Critical care; Intensive care medicine; Intensive care performance; Quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mälstam J, Lind L. Therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS)--a method for measuring workload and calculating costs in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992;36:758–763. - PubMed
    1. Metnitz PG. From risk assessment to risk management. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16:475–476. - PubMed
    1. Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, Robinson KA, Dremsizov TT, Young TL. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;288:2151–2162. - PubMed
    1. Pittoni GM, Scatto A. Economics and outcome in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:232–236. - PubMed
    1. Moerer O, Plock E, Mgbor U, Schmid A, Schneider H, Wischnewsky MB, Burchardi H. A German national prevalence study on the cost of intensive care: an evaluation from 51 intensive care units. Crit Care. 2007;11:R69. - PMC - PubMed