Intensive care performance: How should we monitor performance in the future?
- PMID: 25374803
- PMCID: PMC4220140
- DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i4.74
Intensive care performance: How should we monitor performance in the future?
Abstract
Intensive care faces economic challenges. Therefore, evidence proving both effectiveness and efficiency, i.e., cost-effectiveness, of delivered care is needed. Today, the quality of care is an important issue in the health care debate. How do we measure quality of care and how accurate and representative is this measurement? In the following report, several topics which are used for the evaluation of intensive care unit (ICU) performance are discussed: (1) The use of general outcome prediction models to determine the risk of patients who are admitted to ICUs in an increasing variety of case mix for the different intensive care units, together with three major limitations; (2) As critical care outcomes research becomes a more established entity, mortality is now only one of many endpoints that are relevant. Mortality is a limited outcome when assessing critical care performance, while patient interest in quality of life outcomes is relevant; and (3) The Quality Indicators Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine recommended that short-term readmission is a major performance indicator of the quality of intensive care medicine.
Keywords: Critical care; Intensive care medicine; Intensive care performance; Quality of care.
Similar articles
-
The association between outcome-based quality indicators for intensive care units.PLoS One. 2018 Jun 13;13(6):e0198522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198522. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 29897994 Free PMC article.
-
Rating the quality of intensive care units: is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):1976-82. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00005. Crit Care Med. 2002. PMID: 12352029
-
Understanding costs and cost-effectiveness in critical care: report from the second American Thoracic Society workshop on outcomes research.Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Feb 15;165(4):540-50. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.165.4.16541. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002. PMID: 11850349
-
[Ethics in intensive medicine].Anaesthesist. 1997 Apr;46(4):261-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050399. Anaesthesist. 1997. PMID: 9229978 Review. German.
-
Outcome-based clinical indicators for intensive care medicine.Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005 Jun;33(3):303-10. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0503300305. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2005. PMID: 15973912 Review.
Cited by
-
Performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 Score in PICUs in Argentina: A Prospective, National Multicenter Study.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;19(12):e653-e661. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001741. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 30277895 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Unplanned Intensive Care Unit Readmission Scores: A Prospective Cohort Study.PLoS One. 2015 Nov 23;10(11):e0143127. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143127. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26600463 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mälstam J, Lind L. Therapeutic intervention scoring system (TISS)--a method for measuring workload and calculating costs in the ICU. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1992;36:758–763. - PubMed
-
- Metnitz PG. From risk assessment to risk management. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16:475–476. - PubMed
-
- Pronovost PJ, Angus DC, Dorman T, Robinson KA, Dremsizov TT, Young TL. Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;288:2151–2162. - PubMed
-
- Pittoni GM, Scatto A. Economics and outcome in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:232–236. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials