Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients
- PMID: 25374804
- PMCID: PMC4220141
- DOI: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i4.80
Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients
Abstract
Venous access devices are of pivotal importance for an increasing number of critically ill patients in a variety of disease states and in a variety of clinical settings (emergency, intensive care, surgery) and for different purposes (fluids or drugs infusions, parenteral nutrition, antibiotic therapy, hemodynamic monitoring, procedures of dialysis/apheresis). However, healthcare professionals are commonly worried about the possible consequences that may result using a central venous access device (CVAD) (mainly, bloodstream infections and thrombosis), both peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs). This review aims to discuss indications, insertion techniques, and care of PICCs in critically ill patients. PICCs have many advantages over standard CICCs. First of all, their insertion is easy and safe -due to their placement into peripheral veins of the arm- and the advantage of a central location of catheter tip suitable for all osmolarity and pH solutions. Using the ultrasound-guidance for the PICC insertion, the risk of hemothorax and pneumothorax can be avoided, as well as the possibility of primary malposition is very low. PICC placement is also appropriate to avoid post-procedural hemorrhage in patients with an abnormal coagulative state who need a CVAD. Some limits previously ascribed to PICCs (i.e., low flow rates, difficult central venous pressure monitoring, lack of safety for radio-diagnostic procedures, single-lumen) have delayed their start up in the intensive care units as common practice. Though, the recent development of power-injectable PICCs overcomes these technical limitations and PICCs have started to spread in critical care settings. Two important take-home messages may be drawn from this review. First, the incidence of complications varies depending on venous accesses and healthcare professionals should be aware of the different clinical performance as well as of the different risks associated with each type of CVAD (CICCs or PICCs). Second, an inappropriate CVAD choice and, particularly, an inadequate insertion technique are relevant-and often not recognized-potential risk factors for complications in critically ill patients. We strongly believe that all healthcare professionals involved in the choice, insertion or management of CVADs in critically ill patients should know all potential risk factors of complications. This knowledge may minimize complications and guarantee longevity to the CVAD optimizing the risk/benefit ratio of CVAD insertion and use. Proper management of CVADs in critical care saves lines and lives. Much evidence from the medical literature and from the clinical practice supports our belief that, compared to CICCs, the so-called power-injectable peripherally inserted central catheters are a good alternative choice in critical care.
Keywords: Blood stream infections; Central venous catheters; Critical care medicine; Guidelines; Intensive care unit patients; Pediatrics; Peripherally inserted central catheters; Ultrasound guidance; Venous access devices.
Figures









Similar articles
-
The safety of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in critically ill patients: A retrospective observational study.J Vasc Access. 2024 Sep;25(5):1479-1485. doi: 10.1177/11297298231169059. Epub 2023 Apr 18. J Vasc Access. 2024. PMID: 37070255
-
Comparative Complication Rates of 854 Central Venous Access Devices for Home Parenteral Nutrition in Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study of Over 169,000 Catheter-Days.JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021 May;45(4):768-776. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1939. Epub 2020 Jul 4. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2021. PMID: 32511768
-
Prospective clinical study on the incidence of catheter-related complications in a neurological intensive care unit: 4 years of experience.J Vasc Access. 2024 Jan;25(1):100-106. doi: 10.1177/11297298221097267. Epub 2022 May 23. J Vasc Access. 2024. PMID: 35603516
-
Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)-related thrombosis in critically ill patients.J Vasc Access. 2014 Sep-Oct;15(5):329-37. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000239. Epub 2014 Apr 25. J Vasc Access. 2014. PMID: 24811591 Review.
-
Tunneled and routine peripherally inserted central catheters placement in adult and pediatric population: review, technical feasibility, and troubleshooting.Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021 Apr;11(4):1619-1627. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-694. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2021. PMID: 33816196 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Variation in prevalence and patterns of peripherally inserted central catheter use in adults hospitalized with pneumonia.J Hosp Med. 2016 Aug;11(8):568-75. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2586. Epub 2016 Apr 19. J Hosp Med. 2016. PMID: 27091304 Free PMC article.
-
Peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients - complications and its prevention: A review.Int J Nurs Sci. 2018 Dec 21;6(1):99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.12.007. eCollection 2019 Jan 10. Int J Nurs Sci. 2018. PMID: 31406874 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters (PICC) versus totally implantable venous access device (PORT) for chemotherapy administration: a meta-analysis on gynecological cancer patients.Acta Biomed. 2021 Nov 3;92(5):e2021257. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92i5.11844. Acta Biomed. 2021. PMID: 34738565 Free PMC article.
-
Can Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Be Safely Placed in Patients with Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy? A Retrospective Study of Almost 400,000 Catheter-Days.Oncologist. 2019 Sep;24(9):e953-e959. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0281. Epub 2019 Feb 12. Oncologist. 2019. PMID: 30755503 Free PMC article.
-
Peripherally InSerted CEntral catheter dressing and securement in patients with cancer: the PISCES trial. Protocol for a 2x2 factorial, superiority randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 15;7(6):e015291. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015291. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 28619777 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Barton AJ, Danek G, Johns P, Coons M. Improving patient outcomes through CQI: vascular access planning. J Nurs Care Qual. 1998;13:77–85. - PubMed
-
- Ryder MA. Peripheral access options. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1995;4:395–427. - PubMed
-
- Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1159–1171. - PubMed
-
- Million Lives Campaign. Getting Started Kit: Prevent Central Line Infections How-to Guide. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Available from: http: //www.ihi.org/
-
- Bozzetti F, Mariani L, Bertinet DB, Chiavenna G, Crose N, De Cicco M, Gigli G, Micklewright A, Moreno Villares JM, Orban A, et al. Central venous catheter complications in 447 patients on home parenteral nutrition: an analysis of over 100.000 catheter days. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:475–485. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources