Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov 4;3(4):80-94.
doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i4.80.

Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients

Affiliations
Review

Focus on peripherally inserted central catheters in critically ill patients

Paolo Cotogni et al. World J Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Venous access devices are of pivotal importance for an increasing number of critically ill patients in a variety of disease states and in a variety of clinical settings (emergency, intensive care, surgery) and for different purposes (fluids or drugs infusions, parenteral nutrition, antibiotic therapy, hemodynamic monitoring, procedures of dialysis/apheresis). However, healthcare professionals are commonly worried about the possible consequences that may result using a central venous access device (CVAD) (mainly, bloodstream infections and thrombosis), both peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and centrally inserted central catheters (CICCs). This review aims to discuss indications, insertion techniques, and care of PICCs in critically ill patients. PICCs have many advantages over standard CICCs. First of all, their insertion is easy and safe -due to their placement into peripheral veins of the arm- and the advantage of a central location of catheter tip suitable for all osmolarity and pH solutions. Using the ultrasound-guidance for the PICC insertion, the risk of hemothorax and pneumothorax can be avoided, as well as the possibility of primary malposition is very low. PICC placement is also appropriate to avoid post-procedural hemorrhage in patients with an abnormal coagulative state who need a CVAD. Some limits previously ascribed to PICCs (i.e., low flow rates, difficult central venous pressure monitoring, lack of safety for radio-diagnostic procedures, single-lumen) have delayed their start up in the intensive care units as common practice. Though, the recent development of power-injectable PICCs overcomes these technical limitations and PICCs have started to spread in critical care settings. Two important take-home messages may be drawn from this review. First, the incidence of complications varies depending on venous accesses and healthcare professionals should be aware of the different clinical performance as well as of the different risks associated with each type of CVAD (CICCs or PICCs). Second, an inappropriate CVAD choice and, particularly, an inadequate insertion technique are relevant-and often not recognized-potential risk factors for complications in critically ill patients. We strongly believe that all healthcare professionals involved in the choice, insertion or management of CVADs in critically ill patients should know all potential risk factors of complications. This knowledge may minimize complications and guarantee longevity to the CVAD optimizing the risk/benefit ratio of CVAD insertion and use. Proper management of CVADs in critical care saves lines and lives. Much evidence from the medical literature and from the clinical practice supports our belief that, compared to CICCs, the so-called power-injectable peripherally inserted central catheters are a good alternative choice in critical care.

Keywords: Blood stream infections; Central venous catheters; Critical care medicine; Guidelines; Intensive care unit patients; Pediatrics; Peripherally inserted central catheters; Ultrasound guidance; Venous access devices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasound visualization of the internal jugular vein and the carotid artery on the right side of the neck. IJV: Internal jugular vein; CA: Carotid artery.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ultrasound visualization of vessels of right upper arm: the brachial artery is the middle of two brachial veins. BA: Brachial artery; BV: Brachial veins.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ultrasound-guided venipuncture of the axillary vein.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Stabilization with a sutureless device of a peripherally inserted central catheter.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Stabilization with a sutureless device of a centrally inserted central catheter.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Post-procedural chest X-ray. The left arrow shows the tip position of the peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) that is at cavo-atrial junction (between the superior vena cava and the right atrium). The right arrow shows the tracheal carina.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The electrocardiographic method (intracavitary electrocardiography). The red arrow shows the maximal height of P-wave detectable when the catheter tip is at cavo-atrial junction (intracavitary EKG = red line, lead II). The yellow line is the surface EKG (lead III). EKG: Electrocardiography.
Figure 8
Figure 8
A neonate in intensive care unit with a centrally inserted central catheter.
Figure 9
Figure 9
A children in intensive care unit with a peripherally inserted central catheter.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barton AJ, Danek G, Johns P, Coons M. Improving patient outcomes through CQI: vascular access planning. J Nurs Care Qual. 1998;13:77–85. - PubMed
    1. Ryder MA. Peripheral access options. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1995;4:395–427. - PubMed
    1. Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ. The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc. 2006;81:1159–1171. - PubMed
    1. Million Lives Campaign. Getting Started Kit: Prevent Central Line Infections How-to Guide. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Available from: http: //www.ihi.org/
    1. Bozzetti F, Mariani L, Bertinet DB, Chiavenna G, Crose N, De Cicco M, Gigli G, Micklewright A, Moreno Villares JM, Orban A, et al. Central venous catheter complications in 447 patients on home parenteral nutrition: an analysis of over 100.000 catheter days. Clin Nutr. 2002;21:475–485. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources