Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:238520.
doi: 10.1155/2014/238520. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

Patient aesthetic satisfaction with timing of nasal fracture manipulation

Affiliations

Patient aesthetic satisfaction with timing of nasal fracture manipulation

Sunil Dutt Sharma et al. Surg Res Pract. 2014.

Abstract

Introduction. To determine patient cosmetic satisfaction following nasal fracture manipulation under general anaesthetic when offered at different time intervals after injury. Materials and Methods. Prospective chart review of adult patients with nasal fractures treated by closed reduction at a busy district general hospital in Greater London over a 10-month period. Patients were asked by a standardised telephone interview about satisfaction with nasal cosmesis pre- and postoperatively using a Likert scale. Results. Seventy-six of 106 patients presented for nasal manipulation at up to 9 weeks after injury and were successfully contacted (72%) postoperatively. Forty-nine patients (64%) reported that they still would have had the surgery in retrospect. Those done within 1-2 weeks after injury resulted in the highest mean satisfaction score (4.56 ± 0.25). There was a negative correlation between patient satisfaction and timing of surgery (ρ = -0.37, P = 0.001). Of the patients satisfied or very satisfied with their procedure, 96% had it done within 4 weeks. Conclusion. The majority of patients treated with closed reduction of nasal fractures under general anaesthetic are satisfied with the cosmetic outcome and would still have undergone surgery in retrospect. Increasing time of surgery after 2 weeks resulted in lower patient satisfaction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relationship between timing of surgery after injury and patient satisfaction.

References

    1. Illum P, Kristensen S, Jorgensen K, Pedersen CB. Role of fixation in the treatment of nasal fractures. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences. 1983;8(3):191–195. - PubMed
    1. Mondin V, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Management of nasal bone fractures. American Journal of Otolaryngology. 2005;26(3):181–185. - PubMed
    1. Kapoor PK, Richards S, Dhanasekar G, Kumar BN. Management of nasal injuries: a postal questionnaire survey of UK ENT consultants. Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 2002;116(5):346–348. - PubMed
    1. Ridder GJ, Boedeker CC, Fradis M, Schipper J. Technique and timing for closed reduction of isolated nasal fractures: a retrospective study. Ear, Nose and Throat Journal. 2002;81(1):49–54. - PubMed
    1. Murray JAM, Maran AGD. The treatment of nasal injuries by manipulation. Journal of Laryngology and Otology. 1980;94(12):1405–1410. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources