Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Apr;147(4):959-968.
doi: 10.1378/chest.14-1216.

Trends in mechanical ventilation among patients hospitalized with acute exacerbations of COPD in the United States, 2001 to 2011

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Trends in mechanical ventilation among patients hospitalized with acute exacerbations of COPD in the United States, 2001 to 2011

Mihaela S Stefan et al. Chest. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute exacerbation of COPD has increased over time. However, little is known about patient factors influencing its use in routine clinical practice.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 723,560 hospitalizations for exacerbation of COPD at 475 hospitals between 2001 and 2011. The primary study outcome was the initial form of ventilation (NIV or invasive mechanical ventilation [IMV]). Hierarchical generalized linear models were used to examine the trends in ventilation and patient characteristics associated with receipt of NIV.

Results: After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, initial NIV increased by 15.1% yearly (from 5.9% to 14.8%), and initial IMV declined by 3.2% yearly (from 8.7% to 5.9%); annual exposure to any form of mechanical ventilation increased by 4.4% (from 14.1% to 20.3%). Among case subjects treated with ventilation, those aged ≥ 85 years had a 22% higher odds of receiving NIV compared with those aged < 65 years, while blacks (OR, 0.86) and Hispanics (OR, 0.91) were less likely to be treated with NIV than were whites. Cases with a high burden of comorbidities and those with concomitant pneumonia had high rates of NIV failure and were more likely to receive initial IMV. Use of NIV increased at a faster rate among the admissions of the oldest patients relative to the youngest.

Conclusions: The use of NIV for COPD exacerbations has increased steadily, whereas IMV use has declined. Several patient factors, including age, race, and comorbidities, influenced the receipt of NIV. Further research is needed to identify the factors driving these patterns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –
Trends in initial ventilation strategies and NIV failure. IMV = invasive mechanical ventilation; MV = mechanical ventilation; NIV = noninvasive ventilation.
Figure 2 –
Figure 2 –
Trends in ventilation use in COPD with and without pneumonia, 2001 to 2011. A, Any ventilation. B, Noninvasive ventilation. C, Invasive ventilation.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FastStats. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) includes: chronic bronchitis and emphysema. CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/copd.htm. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention website. Accessed December 10, 2013.
    1. NHLBI morbidity and mortality chartbook. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute website. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/research/2012_ChartBook_508.pdf. Accessed March 11, 2014.
    1. Todisco T, Baglioni S, Eslami A, et al. Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic respiratory failure: integrated use of negative pressure ventilation and noninvasive positive pressure ventilation. Chest. 2004;125(6):2217-2223. - PubMed
    1. Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(13):817-822. - PubMed
    1. Lightowler JV, Wedzicha JA, Elliott MW, Ram FS. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation to treat respiratory failure resulting from exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;326(7382):185. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types