Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 15;121(6):927-34.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.29104. Epub 2014 Nov 6.

Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care

Affiliations

Bringing PROMIS to practice: brief and precise symptom screening in ambulatory cancer care

Lynne I Wagner et al. Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Supportive oncology practice can be enhanced by the integration of a brief and validated electronic patient-reported outcome assessment into the electronic health record (EHR) and clinical workflow.

Methods: Six hundred thirty-six women receiving gynecologic oncology outpatient care received instructions to complete clinical assessments through Epic MyChart, an EHR patient communication portal. Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer adaptive tests (CATs) were administered to assess fatigue, pain interference, physical function, depression, and anxiety. Checklists identified psychosocial concerns, informational and nutritional needs, and risk factors for inadequate nutrition. Assessment results, including PROMIS T scores with documented severity thresholds, were immediately populated in the EHR. Clinicians were notified of clinically elevated symptoms through EHR messages. EHR integration was designed to provide automated triage to social work providers for psychosocial concerns, to health educators for information, and to dietitians for nutrition-related concerns.

Results: Four thousand forty-two MyChart messages sent, and 3203 (79%) were reviewed by patients. The assessment was started by 1493 patients (37%), and once they started, 93% (1386 patients) completed the assessment. According to first assessments only, 49.8% of the patients who reviewed the MyChart message completed the assessment. Mean PROMIS CAT T scores indicated a lower level of physical function and elevated anxiety in comparison with the general population. Fatigue, pain, and depression scores were comparable to those of the general population. Impaired physical functioning was the most common basis for clinical alerts and occurred in 4% of the patients.

Conclusions: PROMIS CATs were used to measure common cancer symptoms in routine oncology outpatient care. Immediate EHR integration facilitated the use of symptom reporting as the basis for referral to psychosocial and supportive care.

Keywords: eHealth; outcomes measurement; patient-reported outcomes; psychosocial care; symptom management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest and Disclosure Statement: The authors have no disclosures to report

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Diagram illustrating electronic medical record integration of PROMIS assessment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Portenoy RK, Thaler HT, Kornblith AB, et al. Symptom prevalence, characteristics and distress in a cancer population. Quality of Life Research. 1994;3:183–189. - PubMed
    1. Cella D. Factors influencing quality of life in cancer patients: Anemia and fatigue. Seminars in oncology. 1998;25:43–46. - PubMed
    1. Abernethy AP, Zafar SY, Wheeler JL, Lyerly HK, Ahmad A, Reese JB. Electronic patient-reported data capture as a foundation of rapid learning cancer care. Medical Care. 2010;48:S32–S38. - PubMed
    1. American College of Surgeons Commission on C. Cancer Program Standards 2012 : ensuring patient-centered care. Available from URL: http://www.facs.org/cancer/coc/cocprogramstandards2012.pdf.
    1. Basch E, Abernethy AP. Supporting Clinical Practice Decisions With Real-Time Patient-Reported Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2011;29:954–956. - PubMed

Publication types