Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Sep;7(3):120-5.
doi: 10.4103/0974-620X.142593.

Influence of visual angle on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials

Ruchi Kothari  1 , Smita Singh  2 , Ramji Singh  3 , A K Shukla  2 , Pradeep Bokariya  4
Affiliations

Influence of visual angle on pattern reversal visual evoked potentials

Ruchi Kothari et al. Oman J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to find whether the visual evoked potential (VEP) latencies and amplitude are altered with different visual angles in healthy adult volunteers or not and to determine the visual angle which is the optimum and most appropriate among a wide range of check sizes for the reliable interpretation of pattern reversal VEPs (PRVEPs).

Materials and methods: The present study was conducted on 40 healthy volunteers. The subjects were divided into two groups. One group consisted of 20 individuals (nine males and 11 females) in the age range of 25-57 years and they were exposed to checks subtending a visual angle of 90, 120, and 180 minutes of arc. Another group comprised of 20 individuals (10 males and 10 females) in the age range of 36-60 years and they were subjected to checks subtending a visual angle of 15, 30, and 120 minutes of arc. The stimulus configuration comprised of the transient pattern reversal method in which a black and white checker board is generated (full field) on a VEP Monitor by an Evoked Potential Recorder (RMS EMG. EPMARK II). The statistical analysis was done by One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) using EPI INFO 6.

Results: In Group I, the maximum (max.) P100 latency of 98.8 ± 4.7 and the max. P100 amplitude of 10.05 ± 3.1 μV was obtained with checks of 90 minutes. In Group II, the max. P100 latency of 105.19 ± 4.75 msec as well as the max. P100 amplitude of 8.23 ± 3.30 μV was obtained with 15 minutes. The min. P100 latency in both the groups was obtained with checks of 120 minutes while the min. P100 amplitude was obtained with 180 minutes. A statistically significant difference was derived between means of P100 latency for 15 and 30 minutes with reference to its value for 120 minutes and between the mean value of P100 amplitude for 120 minutes and that of 90 and 180 minutes.

Conclusion: Altering the size of stimulus (visual angle) has an effect on the PRVEP parameters. Our study found that the 120 is the appropriate (and optimal) check size that can be used for accurate interpretation of PRVEPs. This will help in better assessment of the optic nerve function and integrity of anterior visual pathways.

Keywords: P100 amplitude; P100 latency; Pattern reversal; VEP; visual angle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Blakemore C, Campbell FW. On the existence of neurons in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J Physiol. 1969;203:237–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. De Valois KK, De Valois RL, Yund EW. Responses of striate cortex cells to grating and checkerboard patterns. J Physiol. 1979;291:483–505. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Birch EE, Bosworth RG. Visual evoked potentials in infants and children. In: Aminoff MJ, editor. Electrodiagnosis in Clinical Neurology. 5th ed. New York: Churchill–Livingstone; 2004. pp. 439–50.
    1. Odom VJ, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP, Vaegan ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update) Doc Ophthalmol. 2010;120:111–9. - PubMed
    1. Chen WT, Ko YC, Liao KK, Hsieh JC, Yeh TC, Wu ZA, et al. Optimal check size and reversal rate to elicit pattern-reversal MEG responses. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005;32:218–24. - PubMed