Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014:2014:413926.
doi: 10.1155/2014/413926. Epub 2014 Oct 14.

Reporting misconduct of a coworker to protect a patient: a comparison between experienced nurses and nursing students

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Reporting misconduct of a coworker to protect a patient: a comparison between experienced nurses and nursing students

Abraham Mansbach et al. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014.

Abstract

Purpose: Whistleblowing is the reporting of illegal, immoral, or illegitimate practices to persons or organizations that may affect the action. The current study compares experienced nurses to nursing students regarding their willingness to blow the whistle to protect a patient's interests.

Methods: 165 participants were divided into two groups: 82 undergraduate nursing students and 83 experienced nurses. Participants responded to two vignettes that described a colleague's and a manager's misconduct at work.

Results: The nursing students perceived the severity of the misconduct significantly lower compared to the experienced nurses. The nursing students also ranked the internal and external whistleblowing indices higher than the nurses, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. For each of the examined internal and external indices, professional experience was found to be significant in multivariate regression analyses.

Conclusions: Even though nursing students perceived the severity of the misconduct significantly lower than the experienced nurses, the students demonstrated a greater readiness to blow the whistle, both internally and externally. Recommendations for handling comparable situations are offered.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Miceli M. P., Near J. P., Dworkin T. M. Whistleblowing in Organizations. New York, NY, USA: Taylor & Francis; 2008.
    1. Skivenes M., Trygstad C. S. When whistle-blowing works the Norwegian case. Human Relations. 2010;20:1–27.
    1. Mesmer-Magnus J. R., Viswesvaran C. Whistleblowing in organizations: an examination of correlates of whistleblowing intentions, actions, and retaliation. Journal of Business Ethics. 2005;62(3):277–297. doi: 10.1007/s10551-005-0849-1. - DOI
    1. Rost P. The Whistleblower Confessions of a Healthcare Hitman. New York, NY, USA: Soft Skull Press; 2006.
    1. Mansbach A., Bachner Y. G. Self-reported likelihood of whistleblowing by social work students. Social Work Education. 2009;28(2):18–28. doi: 10.1080/02615470701770792. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources