Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;68(3):568-84.
doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.961934. Epub 2014 Nov 7.

Cue strength in second-language processing: an eye-tracking study

Affiliations

Cue strength in second-language processing: an eye-tracking study

Alba Tuninetti et al. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015.

Abstract

This study used eye-tracking and grammaticality judgement measures to examine how second-language (L2) learners process syntactic violations in English. Participants were native Arabic and native Mandarin Chinese speakers studying English as an L2, and monolingual English-speaking controls. The violations involved incorrect word order and differed in two ways predicted to be important by the unified competition model [UCM; MacWhinney, B. (2005). A unified model of language acquisition. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 49-67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.]. First, one violation had more and stronger cues to ungrammaticality than the other. Second, the grammaticality of these word orders varied in Arabic and Mandarin Chinese. Sensitivity to violations was relatively quick overall, across all groups. Sensitivity also was related to the number and strength of cues to ungrammaticality regardless of native language, which is consistent with the general principles of the UCM. However, there was little evidence of cross-language transfer effects in either eye movements or grammaticality judgements.

Keywords: Cross-language transfer; Cue strength; Eye-tracking; Second-language learning; Unified competition model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Grammaticality judgment accuracy by native language group and grammaticality.

References

    1. Bates E, MacWhinney B. Competition, variation, and language learning. In: MacWhinney B, editor. Mechanisms of Language Acquisition: The 20th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition; Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Publishers; 1987.
    1. Bauman J. About the General Service List. 2010 Retrieved September 11, 2010, from http://jbauman.com/aboutgsl.html#1953.
    1. Bohan J, Sanford AJ. Semantic anomalies at the borderline of consciousness: An eye-tracking investigation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2008;61:232–239. - PubMed
    1. Chang J. Chinese Speakers. In: Swan M, Smith B, editors. Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems. Second Edition. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, England: 1987.
    1. Clahsen H, Felser C. Grammatical processing in language learners. Applied Psycholinguistics. 2006a;27:3–42.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources