Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 1;210 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S549-55.
doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu483.

Heterogeneity in risk of pelvic inflammatory diseases after chlamydia infection: a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada

Affiliations

Heterogeneity in risk of pelvic inflammatory diseases after chlamydia infection: a population-based study in Manitoba, Canada

Bethan Davies et al. J Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The association between chlamydia infection and pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a key parameter for models evaluating the impact of chlamydia control programs. We quantified this association using a retrospective population-based cohort.

Methods: We used administrative health data sets to construct a retrospective population-based cohort of women and girls aged 12-24 years who were resident in Manitoba, Canada, between 1992 and 1996. We performed survival analysis on a subcohort of individuals who were tested for chlamydia to estimate the risk of PID diagnosed in a primary care, outpatient, or inpatient setting after ≥ 1 positive chlamydia test.

Results: A total of 73 883 individuals contributed 625 621 person years of follow-up. Those with a diagnosis of chlamydia had an increased risk of PID over their reproductive lifetime compared with those who tested negative (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-1.70). This risk increased with each subsequent infection: the AHR was 1.17 for first reinfection (95% CI, 1.06-1.30) and 1.35 for the second (95% CI, 1.04-1.75). The increased risk of PID from reinfection was highest in younger individuals (AHR, 4.55 (95% CI, 3.59-5.78) in individuals aged 12-15 years at the time of their second reinfection, compared with individuals older than 30 years).

Conclusions: There is heterogeneity in the risk of PID after a chlamydia infection. Describing the progression to PID in mathematical models as an average rate may be an oversimplification; more accurate estimates of the cost-effectiveness of screening may be obtained by using an individual-based measure of risk. Health inequalities may be reduced by targeting health promotion interventions at sexually active girls younger than 16 years and those with a history of chlamydia.

Keywords: Chlamydia trachomatis; cohort study; cost effectiveness; epidemiology; mathematical models; pelvic inflammatory disease; retrospective study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cohort formation. Abbreviations: MH, Manitoba Health; PID, pelvic inflammatory disease.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves of time to pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) by test result. After the first (A), second (B), and third (C) chlamydia tests. Solid = negative women; dashed = positive women.

References

    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Stockholm, Sweden: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; 2009. Chlamydia control in Europe.
    1. Gottlieb SL, Berman SM, Low N. Screening and treatment to prevent sequelae in women with Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection: how much do we know? J Infect Dis. 2010;201(suppl 2)):S156–67. - PubMed
    1. Adams EJ, Turner KM, Edmunds WJ. The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England. Sex Transm Infect. 2007;83:267–75. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersen B, Gundgaard J, Kretzschmar M, Olsen J, Welte R, Oster-Gaard L. Prediction of costs, effectiveness, and disease control of a population-based program using home sampling for diagnosis of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections. Sex Transm Dis. 2006;33:407–15. - PubMed
    1. Low N, McCarthy A, Macleod J, et al. Epidemiological, social, diagnostic and economic evaluation of population screening for genital chlamydial infection. Health Technol Assess. 2007;11:iii–iv. ix-xii, 1–165. - PubMed

Publication types