Safety and effectiveness of bubble continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress
- PMID: 25382905
- PMCID: PMC4223220
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2013.08.003
Safety and effectiveness of bubble continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress
Abstract
Background: Studies on Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (B-CPAP) as respiratory support for neonates are few. The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of B-CPAP in preterm neonates requiring respiratory support.
Methods: A prospective observation study was done on 50 preterm babies requiring respiratory support for mild to moderate respiratory distress. Support was given with short, nasal cannulae. Surfactant was administered when indicated. Monitoring was done clinically, with pulse oximeter, radiologically and with blood gases. Staff members were also asked their views. Follow-up was done for 3 months.
Results: The mean gestational age was 32.46 (+3.23) weeks and mean birth weight 1454.4 (+487.42) g. Respiratory Distress Syndrome was the commonest indication (30/50). The mean maximum pressure was 6.04 cm H2O and mean maximum FiO2 was 72.16%. Mean maximum paO2, paCO2 and mean minimum paCO2 were 92.93 mm Hg (+16.97), 52.36 mm Hg (+ 7.78) and 36.46 mm Hg (+ 4.95) respectively. Early initiation resulted in lesser duration of support. Failure rate was 30%. Apnoea, >1 dose surfactant and late initiation had a statistically higher incidence of failure. Main complications were skin abrasions (30%), feed intolerance (26%) and gastric distension (26%). Survival rate was 94%. 68% of staff felt that it was as easy to use and 88% felt it was more reliable than standard CPAP.
Conclusions: Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure is safe, efficacious and easy to use in preterm neonates with mild to moderate respiratory distress.
Keywords: Bubble; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Preterm; Respiratory distress.
Figures
References
-
- Gregory G.A., Kitterman J.A., Phibbs R.H. Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med. 1971;284:1333–1340. - PubMed
-
- Lee Kyong-Soon, Dunn M.S., Fenwick M., Shennan A.T. A comparison of underwater bubble CPAP with ventilator derived CPAP in premature neonates ready for extubation. Biol Neonate. 1998;73:69–75. - PubMed
-
- Avery M.E., Tooley W.H., Keller J.B. Is chronic lung disease in low-birth-weight infants preventable? A survey of eight centers. Pediatrics. 1987;79:26–30. - PubMed
-
- Manilal-Reddy P.I., Al-Jumaily A.M. Understanding the use of continuous oscillating positive airway pressure (bubble CPAP) to treat neonatal respiratory disease: an engineering approach. J Med Eng Technol. 2009;33:214–222. - PubMed
-
- Kahn D.J., Habib R.H., Courtney S.E. Effects of flow amplitudes on intraprong pressures during bubble versus ventilator-generated nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants. Pediatrics. 2008;122:1009–1013. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
