Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 24:5:1207.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01207. eCollection 2014.

The Gratton effect remains after controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions

Affiliations

The Gratton effect remains after controlling for contingencies and stimulus repetitions

Chris Blais et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The conflict monitoring hypothesis signals the need for cognitive controlThe Gratton effect is a key result attributed to the conflict monitoring hypothesisSome argue that controlling binding confounds eliminates the Gratton effect A Gratton effect remains in a vocal Stroop task after eliminating confounds The Gratton effect, the observation that the size of the Stroop effect is larger following a congruent trial compared to an incongruent trial, is one pivotal observation in support of the conflict-monitoring hypothesis. Previous reports have demonstrated that non-conflict components, such as feature binding, also contribute to this effect. Critically, Schmidt and De Houwer (2011) report a flanker task and a button-press Stroop task suggesting that there is no conflict adaptation in the Gratton effect; it is entirely caused by feature binding. The current investigation attempts to replicate and extend this important finding across two experiments using a canonical four-choice Stroop task with vocal responses. In contrast to Schmidt and De Houwer, we observe reliable conflict adaptation after controlling for feature binding. We argue that the overall strength of conflict is critical for determining whether a conflict adaptation component will remain in the Gratton effect after explaining binding components.

Keywords: Gratton effect; Stroop effect; cognitive control; cognitive control mechanisms; conflict adaptation; conflict monitoring; feature binding.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The size of the Gratton effect as a function of the proportion of congruent trials. Black lines represent data in which all trials are included in the estimate. Gray lines represent data in which only the trials without feature repetitions are included in the estimate. The panel to the left (A) reflects response time difference scores and the panel to the right (B) reflects error rate difference scores. A positive slope is consistent with the hypothesis that the contingency between the color and the word contributes to the size of the Gratton effect. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

References

    1. Akçay C., Hazeltine E. (2007). Conflict monitoring and feature overlap: two sources of sequential modulations. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 14, 742–748. 10.3758/BF03196831 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blais C., Harris M. B., Guerrero J. V., Bunge S. A. (2010). Rethinking the role of automaticity in cognitive control. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 65, 268–276. 10.1080/17470211003775234 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Botvinick M. M., Braver T. S., Barch D. M., Carter C. S., Cohen J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol. Rev. 108, 624–652. 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Botvinick M. M., Cohen J. D., Carter C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update. Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 539–546. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.10.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carter C. S., Braver T. S., Barch D. M., Botvinick M. M., Noll D., Cohen J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280, 747–749. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources