Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 10;16(11):e225.
doi: 10.2196/jmir.3318.

eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature

Ivan Watkins  1 , Bo Xie
Affiliations

eHealth literacy interventions for older adults: a systematic review of the literature

Ivan Watkins et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: eHealth resources offer new opportunities for older adults to access health information online, connect with others with shared health interests, and manage their health. However, older adults often lack sufficient eHealth literacy to maximize their benefit from these resources.

Objective: This review evaluates the research design, methods, and findings of eHealth literacy interventions for older adults.

Methods: A systematic review of peer-reviewed research articles from 28 databases in 9 fields was carried out in January 2013. Four rounds of screening of articles in these databases resulted in a final sample of 23 articles.

Results: Findings indicated a significant gap in the literature for eHealth literacy interventions evaluating health outcomes as the outcome of interest, a lack of theory-based interventions, and few studies applied high-quality research design.

Conclusions: Our findings emphasize the need for researchers to develop and assess theory-based interventions applying high-quality research design in eHealth literacy interventions targeting the older population.

Keywords: aging; computers; health literacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Four-round selection process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online. 2013. [2014-01-31]. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/PIP_HealthOnline.pdf.
    1. Fox S. The social life of health information. 2011. [2014-01-31]. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP_Social_Life_o....
    1. Korda H, Itani Z. Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jan;14(1):15–23. doi: 10.1177/1524839911405850. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Segal J, Sacopulos M, Sheets V, Thurston I, Brooks K, Puccia R. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care? J Med Internet Res. 2012;14(2):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2005. http://www.jmir.org/2012/2/e50/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi N, Dinitto Dm. The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/Internet use. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(5):e93. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2645. http://www.jmir.org/2013/5/e93/ - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types