Similar articles

• The difference in superior adjacent segment pathology after lumbar posterolateral fusion by using 2 different pedicle screw insertion techniques in 9-year minimum follow-up.

  He B, Yan L, Guo H, Liu T, Wang X, Hao D. He B, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 15;39(14):1093-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000353. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014. PMID: 24827514 Clinical Trial.
• Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration after successful posterolateral fusion with unilateral or bilateral pedicle screw instrumentation: a minimum 10-year follow-up.

  Kim TH, Lee BH, Moon SH, Lee SH, Lee HM. Kim TH, et al. Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1208-16. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.431. Epub 2013 Sep 25. Spine J. 2013. PMID: 24075027
• [Two different fixation methods combined with lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of two-level lumbar vertebra diseases: a clinical comparison study].

  Zeng ZY, Wu P, Sun DT, Mao KY, Zhang JQ, Ji JF, Song YX, Han JF, Song GH, Tang HC. Zeng ZY, et al. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015 Oct;28(10):903-9. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2015. PMID: 26727781 Chinese.
• Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.

  Sakaura H, Miwa T, Yamashita T, Kuroda Y, Ohwada T. Sakaura H, et al. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):591-595. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151525. Epub 2016 May 27. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27231813
• Pedicle screw insertion techniques: an update and review of the literature.

  Perna F, Borghi R, Pilla F, Stefanini N, Mazzotti A, Chehrassan M. Perna F, et al. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016 Dec;100(3):165-169. doi: 10.1007/s12306-016-0438-8. Epub 2016 Nov 19. Musculoskelet Surg. 2016. PMID: 27866324 Review.