Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Oct 28:8:344.
doi: 10.3389/fnins.2014.00344. eCollection 2014.

Epigenetic changes in the estrogen receptor α gene promoter: implications in sociosexual behaviors

Affiliations
Review

Epigenetic changes in the estrogen receptor α gene promoter: implications in sociosexual behaviors

Ken Ichi Matsuda. Front Neurosci. .

Abstract

Estrogen action through estrogen receptor α (ERα) is involved in the control of sexual and social behaviors in adult mammals. Alteration of ERα gene activity mediated by epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone modifications and DNA methylation, in particular brain areas appears to be crucial for determining the extents of these behaviors between the sexes and among individuals within the same sex. This review provides a summary of the epigenetic changes in the ERα gene promoter that correlate with sociosexual behaviors.

Keywords: DNA methylation; epigenetics; estrogen receptor α; histone acetylation; histone deacetylation; sexual behavior; sexual differentiation; sociosexual behavior.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of DNA methylation status in the ERα gene in association with sociosexual behaviors. E, embryonic day; P, postnatal day.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Developmental changes in histone acetylation status in the ERα 0B promoter in the preoptic area in male and female rat. E, embryonic day; P, postnatal day.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Developmental changes in epigenetic status in the ER α 0B promoter in the preoptic area in male rat. E, embryonic day; P, postnatal day.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Arnold A. P., Gorski R. A. (1984). Gonadal steroid induction of structural sex differences in the central nervous system. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 7, 413–442. 10.1146/annurev.ne.07.030184.002213 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bicaku E., Marchion D. C., Schmitt M. L., Munster P. N. (2008). Selective inhibition of histone deacetylase 2 silences progesterone receptor-mediated signaling. Cancer Res. 68, 1513–1519. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2822 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cameron N., Del Corpo A., Diorio J., McAllister K., Sharma S., Meaney M. J. (2008a). Maternal programming of sexual behavior and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function in the female rat. PLoS ONE 3:e2210. 10.1371/journal.pone.0002210 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cameron N. M., Champagne F. A., Parent C., Fish E. W., Ozaki-Kuroda K., Meaney M. J. (2005). The programming of individual differences in defensive responses and reproductive strategies in the rat through variations in maternal care. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 29, 843–865. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.03.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cameron N. M., Fish E. W., Meaney M. J. (2008b). Maternal influences on the sexual behavior and reproductive success of the female rat. Horm. Behav. 54, 178–184. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.02.013 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources