Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 7;22(1):37.
doi: 10.1186/s12998-014-0037-4. eCollection 2014.

Compensation claims for chiropractic in Denmark and Norway 2004-2012

Jørgen Jevne  1 , Jan Hartvigsen  2 , Henrik Wulff Christensen  3
Affiliations

Compensation claims for chiropractic in Denmark and Norway 2004-2012

Jørgen Jevne et al. Chiropr Man Therap. .

Abstract

Background: Adverse events are commonly observed in all parts of health care and have been reported extensively following manual therapy, including chiropractic. The majority of reported adverse events following chiropractic care are mild, transitory and self-limiting. However, little is known about patient filed compensation claims related to the chiropractic consultation process. The aim of this study was to describe claims reported to the Danish Patient Compensation Association and the Norwegian System of Compensation to Patients related to chiropractic from 2004 to 2012.

Methods: All finalized compensation claims involving chiropractors reported to one of the two associations between 2004 and 2012 were assessed for age, gender, type of complaint, decisions and appeals. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the study population.

Results: 338 claims were registered in Denmark and Norway between 2004 and 2012 of which 300 were included in the analysis. 41 (13.7%) were approved for financial compensation. The most frequent complaints were worsening of symptoms following treatment (n = 91, 30.3%), alleged disk herniations (n = 57, 19%) and cases with delayed referral (n = 46, 15.3%). A total financial payment of €2,305,757 (median payment €7,730) were distributed among the forty-one cases with complaints relating to a few cases of cervical artery dissection (n = 11, 5.7%) accounting for 88.7% of the total amount.

Conclusion: Chiropractors in Denmark and Norway received approximately one compensation claim per 100.000 consultations. The approval rate was low across the majority of complaint categories and lower than the approval rates for general practioners and physiotherapists. Many claims can probably be prevented if chiropractors would prioritize informing patients about the normal course of their complaint and normal benign reactions to treatment.

Keywords: Adverse events; Chiropractic; Compensation claims; Manual therapy; Side effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the inclusion and exclusion process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of reported claims per year 2004 to 2012. Number of annually reported claims to the two compensation associations since their respective inception.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gender comparisons between chiropractic patients and reported compensation claims. LEFT: Proportion (%) of male patients in Danish chiropractic practice in 2012 compared with proportion (%) of reported compensation claims by male patients in Denmark during 2004–2012. RIGHT: Proportion (%) of female patients in Danish chiropractic practice in 2012 compared with proportion (%) of reported compensation claims by female patients in Denmark during 2004–2012.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ioannidis JP. Adverse events in randomized trials: neglected, restricted, distorted, and silenced. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1737–1739. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.313. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McIntosh HM, Woolacott NF, Bagnall AM. Assessing harmful effects in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2004;4:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-4-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zorzela L, Golder S, Liu Y, Pilkington K, Hartling L, Joffe A, Loke Y, Vohra S. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews of adverse events: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348:f7668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f7668. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pitrou I, Boutron I, Ahmad N, Ravaud P. Reporting of safety results in published reports of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1756–1761. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.306. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ohrn A, Olai A, Rutberg H, Nilsen P, Tropp H. Adverse events in spine surgery in Sweden: a comparison of patient claims data and national quality register (Swespine) data. Acta Orthop. 2011;82:727–731. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.636673. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources