Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112008.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112008. eCollection 2014.

Vancomycin dosing in neutropenic patients

Affiliations
Observational Study

Vancomycin dosing in neutropenic patients

Michiel B Haeseker et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: To compare vancomycin pharmacokinetic parameters in patients with and without neutropenia.

Methods: Patients ≥18 years admitted on general wards were included. Routinely vancomycin trough and peak plasma concentrations were measured with a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Pharmacokinetic parameters of individual patients were determined with maximum a posterior Bayesian estimation (MW Pharm 3.60). Neutropenia was defined as neutrophils <0.5×109 cells/L.

Principal findings: A total of 171 patients were included. Patients with neutropenia (n = 56) had higher clearance of vancomycin (CLva), 67 (±26) mL/min, compared to patients without neutropenia (n = 115), CLva 50 (±22) mL/min (p<0.001). No significant difference was found in serum creatinine and vancomycin volume of distribution. Neutropenia was positively associated with CLva, independently of relevant co-variables (B: 12.122, 95%CI: 1.095 to 23.149, p = 0.031). On average patients with neutropenia needed 33% higher doses of vancomycin to attain adequate exposure, i.e. AUC24≥400 mg×h/L. Furthermore, 15 initially neutropenic patients in our study group received vancomycin for a second administration period. Ten patients received the second administration period during another neutropenic period and 5 patients during a non-neutropenic phase. All 5 patients with vancomycin during both neutropenic and non-neutropenic phase had higher CLva (91 (±26) mL/min) during the neutropenic period and lower CLva (45 (±10) mL/min) during the non-neutropenic phase (p = 0.009).

Conclusion: This study shows that most patients with neutropenia have augmented CLva. In a small group of patients that received vancomycin during two episodes, the augmented CLva seems to be reversible in the non-neutropenic period. Our data indicate that it is important to increase the daily dose with one third in patients with neutropenia (from 15 mg/kg twice daily to 13 mg/kg three times daily). Frequent performance of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with neutropenia may prevent both therapy failure due to low AUCs and overcomes toxicity due to high vancomycin trough concentrations during recovery from neutropenia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow of the 171 included patients with regard to hematology, neutropenia and two vancomycin administration periods.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Boxplot for vancomycin clearance (CLva) in patients with and without neutropenia in all patients (A) and in patients with haematological malignancy (B).
Lower and higher boundary of the box indicates 25th and 75th percentile, respectively, the line within the box marks the median, the whiskers above and below the box indicate the 90th and 10th percentiles and the open circles indicate outside the 90th and 10th percentiles.
Figure 3
Figure 3. A. Vancomycin clearance (CLva) and B. serum creatinine of 5 patients (number 1–5) during both a neutropenic and a non-neutropenic phase and C. CLva and D. serum creatinine of 7 patients (number 1–7) during two neutropenic phases.

References

    1. Scott BL, Park JY, Deeg HJ, Marr KA, Boeckh M, et al. (2008) Pretransplant neutropenia is associated with poor-risk cytogenetic features and increased infection-related mortality in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 14: 799–806. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sepkowitz KA (2002) Antibiotic prophylaxis in patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 29: 367–371. - PubMed
    1. Schelenz S, Nwaka D, Hunter PR (2013) Longitudinal surveillance of bacteraemia in haematology and oncology patients at a UK cancer centre and the impact of ciprofloxacin use on antimicrobial resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother 68: 1431–1438. - PubMed
    1. Revilla N, Martin-Suarez A, Perez MP, Gonzalez FM, Fernandez de Gatta Mdel M (2010) Vancomycin dosing assessment in intensive care unit patients based on a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic simulation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 70: 201–212. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Udy AA, Roberts JA, Boots RJ, Paterson DL, Lipman J (2010) Augmented renal clearance: implications for antibacterial dosing in the critically ill. Clin Pharmacokinet 49: 1–16. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources