Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Oct 1;33(4):409-429.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9906.2011.00555.x.

Ethnic Residential Segregation by Nativity in Great Britain and the United States*

Affiliations

Ethnic Residential Segregation by Nativity in Great Britain and the United States*

John Iceland et al. J Urban Aff. .

Abstract

This study examines patterns of ethnic residential integration in Great Britain and the United States. Using data from 2000/2001 censuses from these two countries, we compute segregation indexes for comparably-defined ethnic groups by nativity and for specific foreign-born groups. We find that blacks are much less segregated in Great Britain than in the U.S, and black segregation patterns by nativity tend to be consistent with spatial assimilation in the former country (the foreign born are more segregated than the native born) but not in the latter. Among Asian groups, however, segregation tends to be lower in the United States, and segregation patterns by nativity are more consistent with spatial assimilation in the U.S. but not in Great Britain. These findings suggest that intergenerational minority disadvantage persists among blacks in the U.S. and among Asians in Great Britain. We caution, however, that there are important differences in levels of segregation among specific foreign-born Asian groups, suggesting that assimilation trajectories likely differ by country of origin. Finally, the fact that segregation levels are considerably higher in the U.S. for a majority of groups, including white foreign-born groups, suggests that factors not solely related to race or physical appearance drive higher levels of ethnic residential segregation in the U.S.

Keywords: ethnicity; immigration; integration; segregation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alba Richard, Nee Victor. Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003.
    1. Bean Frank D, Stevens Gillian. America’s Newcomers and the Dynamics of Diversity. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2003.
    1. Bibby Peter R, Shepherd John W. Developing a New Classification of Urban and Rural Areas for Policy Purposes - the Methodology. Report to Office for National Statistics. 2004 Available at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/evidence/statistics/rural/documents/rural-defn/r.... Retrieved October 6, 2010.
    1. Brimicombe Alan. Ethnicity, religion and residential segregation in London: evidence from a computational typology of minority communities. Environment and Planning B. 2007;34(5):884–904.
    1. Bond Steve, Coombes Mike. 2001-based Travel-to-Work Areas Methodology. Office for National Statistics report. 2007 http://www.statistics.gov.uk/geography/downloads/2001_TTWA_Methodology.pdf, Retrieved March 17, 2010.

LinkOut - more resources