Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul-Sep;18(3):e2014.00302.
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00302.

Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain

Stefanos Kachrilas  1 , Elenko Popov  1 , Andreas Bourdoumis  1 , Waseem Akhter  1 , Mohamed El Howairis  2 , Ismaeel Aghaways  3 , Junaid Masood  1 , Noor Buchholz  1
Affiliations

Laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain

Stefanos Kachrilas et al. JSLS. 2014 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Background and objectives: To evaluate the usefulness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy in the management of chronic scrotal pain.

Methods: Between 2009 and 2011, 48 patients in total were treated with laparoscopic varicocelectomy for dull scrotal pain that worsened with physical activity and was attributed to varicoceles. All patients were followed up at 3 and 6 months and biannually thereafter with a physical examination, visual analog scale score, and ultrasonographic scan in selected cases.

Results: The mean age was 38.2 years (range, 23-54 years). The mean follow-up period was 19.6 months (range, 6-26 months). Bilateral varicoceles were present in 7 patients (14.6%), and a unilateral varicocele was present in 41 (85.4%). The varicocele was grade 3 in 27 patients (56.3%), grade 2 in 20 (41.6%), and grade 1 in 1 (2.1%). The mean preoperative visual analog scale score was 4.8 on a scale from 0 to 10. The mean postoperative visual analog scale score at 3 months was 0.8. After the procedure, 42 patients (87.5%) had a significant improvement in the visual analog scale score (P<.001); 5 (10.4%) had symptom improvement, although it was not statistically significant; and 1 (2.1%) remained unchanged. During follow-up, we observed 5 recurrences (10.4%) whereas de novo hydrocele formation was identified in 4 individuals (8.3%).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is efficient in the treatment of symptomatic varicoceles with a low complication rate. However, careful patient selection is necessary because it appears that individuals presenting with sharp, radiating testicular pain and/or a low-grade varicocele are less likely to benefit from this procedure.

Keywords: Laparoscopy; Scrotal pain; Varicocele; Visual analog scale score.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Peterson AC, Lance RS, Ruiz HE. Outcomes of varicocele ligation done for pain. J Urol. 1998;159:1565–1567 - PubMed
    1. Biggers RD, Soderdahl DW. The painful varicocele. Mil Med. 1981;146:440–442 - PubMed
    1. Schlegel PN, Goldstein M. Alternate indications for varicocele repair: non-obstructive azoospermia, pain, androgen deficiency and progressive testicular dysfunction. Fertil Steril. 2011;96(6):1288–1293 - PubMed
    1. Chung SD, Wu CC, Lin VC, et al. Minilaparoscopic varicocelectomy with preservation of testicular artery and lymphatic vessels by using intracorporeal knot-tying technique: five-year experience. World J Surg. 2011;35(8):1785–1790 - PubMed
    1. Söylemez H, Kiliç S, Atar M, et al. Effects of micronised purified flavonoid fraction on pain, semen analysis and scrotal color Doppler parameters in patients with painful varicocele; results of a randomized placebo-controlled study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(2):401–408 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources