Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan;120(1):151-156.
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000446.

Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? an analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database

Santhanam Suresh  1 , Justin Long, Patrick K Birmingham, Gildasio S De Oliveira Jr
Affiliations

Are caudal blocks for pain control safe in children? an analysis of 18,650 caudal blocks from the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network (PRAN) database

Santhanam Suresh et al. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Background: The caudal block is the most commonly performed regional anesthesia technique in pediatric patients undergoing surgical procedures, but safety concerns raised by previous reports remain to be addressed. Our main objective in current investigation was to estimate the overall and specific incidence of complications associated with the performance of caudal block in children.

Methods: This was an observational study using the Pediatric Regional Anesthesia Network database. A complication after a caudal block was defined by the presence of at least 1 of the following: block failure, vascular puncture, intravascular test dose, dural puncture, seizure, cardiac arrest, sacral pain, or neurologic symptoms. In addition, if a complication was also coded, the presence of temporary or permanent sequelae was evaluated. Additional exploratory analyses were performed to identify patterns of local anesthetic dosage.

Results: Eighteen thousand six hundred-fifty children who received a caudal block were included in the study. The overall estimated incidence (95% confidence interval [CI]) of complications after caudal blocks was 1.9% (1.7%-2.1%). Patients who developed complications were younger, median (interquartile range) of 11 (5-24) months, compared to those who did not develop any complications, 14 (7-29) months, P = 0.001. The most common complications were block failure, blood aspiration, and intravascular injection. No cases of temporary or permanent sequelae were identified leading to an estimated incidence (95% CI) of 0.005% (- % to 0.03%). Four thousand four hundred-six of 17,867 (24.6%; 95% CI, 24%-25.2%) subjects received doses (>2 mg of bupivacaine equivalents/kg) that could be potentially unsafe.

Conclusions: Safety concerns should not be a barrier to the use of caudal blocks in children assuming an appropriate selection of local anesthetic dosage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • "Kiddie" caudal: safe but more to learn.
    Boretsky KR, DiNardo JA. Boretsky KR, et al. Anesth Analg. 2015 Jan;120(1):12-13. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000532. Anesth Analg. 2015. PMID: 25625251 No abstract available.

References

    1. Shah RD, Suresh S. Applications of regional anaesthesia in paediatrics. Br J Anaesth. 2013;111(Suppl 1):i114–24
    1. Suresh S, Schaldenbrand K, Wallis B, De Oliveira GS. Regional anaesthesia to improve pain outcomes in pediatric surgical patients: a qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113:375–90
    1. Krane EJ, Polaner D. The safety and effectiveness of continuous peripheral nerve blockade in children. Anesth Analg. 2014;118:499–500
    1. Varughese AM, Rampersad SE, Whitney GM, Flick RP, Anton B, Heitmiller ES. Quality and safety in pediatric anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:1408–18
    1. Kahn MG, Bailey LC, Forrest CB, Padula MA, Hirschfeld S. Building a common pediatric research terminology for accelerating child health research. Pediatrics. 2014;133:516–25

Publication types