Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Mar;36(3):525-9.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4159. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

W Brinjikji  1 , M H Murad  2 , A A Rabinstein  3 , H J Cloft  4 , G Lanzino  4 , D F Kallmes  4
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Conscious sedation versus general anesthesia during endovascular acute ischemic stroke treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

W Brinjikji et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Mar.

Abstract

Background and purpose: A number of studies have suggested that anesthesia type (conscious sedation versus general anesthesia) during intra-arterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke has implications for patient outcomes. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the clinical and angiographic outcomes of the 2 anesthesia types.

Materials and methods: In March 2014, we conducted a computerized search of MEDLINE and EMBASE for reports on anesthesia and endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Using random-effects meta-analysis, we evaluated the following outcomes: recanalization rate, good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2), asymptomatic and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, death, vascular complications, respiratory complications, procedure time, time to groin, and time from symptom onset to recanalization.

Results: Nine studies enrolling 1956 patients (814 with general anesthesia and 1142 with conscious sedation) were included. Compared with patients treated by using conscious sedation during stroke intervention, patients undergoing general anesthesia had higher odds of death (OR = 2.59; 95% CI, 1.87-3.58) and respiratory complications (OR = 2.09; 95% CI, 1.36-3.23) and lower odds of good functional outcome (OR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.35-0.53) and successful angiographic outcome (OR = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.80). No difference in procedure time (P = .28) was seen between the groups. Preintervention NIHSS scores were available from 6 studies; in those, patients receiving general anesthesia had a higher average NIHSS score.

Conclusions: Patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intra-arterial therapy may have worse outcomes with general anesthesia compared with conscious sedation. However, the difference in stroke severity at the onset may confound the comparison in the available studies; thus, a randomized trial is necessary to confirm this association.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Forest plot of meta-analysis results for good functional outcome (mRS ≤ 2).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Brinjikji W, Rabinstein AA, Kallmes DF, et al. . Patient outcomes with endovascular embolectomy therapy for acute ischemic stroke: a study of the National Inpatient Sample: 2006 to 2008. Stroke 2011;42:1648–52 - PubMed
    1. Saver JL. Time is brain–quantified. Stroke 2006;37:263–66 - PubMed
    1. McDonagh DL, Olson DM, Kalia JS, et al. . Anesthesia and sedation practices among neurointerventionalists during acute ischemic stroke endovascular therapy. Front Neurol 2010;1:118. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Molina CA, Selim MH. General or local anesthesia during endovascular procedures: sailing quiet in the darkness or fast under a daylight storm. Stroke 2010;41:2720–21 - PubMed
    1. Brekenfeld C, Mattle HP, Schroth G. General is better than local anesthesia during endovascular procedures. Stroke 2010;41:2716–17 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources