Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec;4(4):279-86.
doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1387807. Epub 2014 Aug 28.

Optimal duration of conservative management prior to surgery for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy: a literature review

Affiliations
Review

Optimal duration of conservative management prior to surgery for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy: a literature review

Vincent J Alentado et al. Global Spine J. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Study Design Literature review. Objective Since the 1970s, spine surgeons have commonly required 6 weeks of failed conservative treatment prior to considering surgical intervention for various spinal pathologies. It is unclear, however, if this standard has been validated in the literature. The authors review the natural history, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness studies relating to the current standard of 6 weeks of nonoperative care prior to surgery for patients with spinal pathologies. Methods A systematic Medline search from 1953 to 2013 was performed to identify natural history, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness studies relating to the optimal period of conservative management prior to surgical intervention for both cervical and lumbar radiculopathy. Demographic information, operative indications, and clinical outcomes are reviewed for each study. Results A total of 5,719 studies were identified; of these, 13 studies were selected for inclusion. Natural history studies demonstrated that 88% of patients with cervical radiculopathy and 70% of patients with lumbar radiculopathy showed improvement within 4 weeks following onset of symptoms. Outcomes and cost-effectiveness studies supported surgical intervention within 8 weeks of symptom onset for both cervical and lumbar radiculopathy. Conclusions There are limited studies supporting any optimal duration of conservative treatment prior to surgery for cervical and lumbar radiculopathy. Therefore, evidence-based conclusions cannot be made. Based on the available literature, we suggest that an optimal timing for surgery following cervical radiculopathy is within 8 weeks of onset of symptoms. A shorter period of 4 weeks may be appropriate based on natural history studies. Additionally, we found that optimal timing for surgery following lumbar radiculopathy is between 4 and 8 weeks. A prospective study is needed to explicitly identify the optimal duration of conservative therapy prior to surgery so that costs may be reduced and patient outcomes improved.

Keywords: cervical radiculopathy; conservative management; lumbar radiculopathy; natural history; preoperative guidelines; surgical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures Vincent J. Alentado, none Daniel Lubelski, none Michael P. Steinmetz, Consultancy: Biomet Spine, Depuy-Synthes Edward C. Benzel, Consultancy: OrthoMEMs, AxioMED; Royalties: DePuy; Stock/stock options: OrthoMEMs, AxioMED Thomas E. Mroz, Board membership: AOSpine; Consultancy: Ceramtec; Stock/stock options: PearlDiver, Inc.

References

    1. Lunsford L D, Bissonette D J, Jannetta P J, Sheptak P E, Zorub D S. Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease. Part 1: Treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases. J Neurosurg. 1980;53(1):1–11. - PubMed
    1. Radhakrishnan K, Litchy W J, O'Fallon W M, Kurland L T. Epidemiology of cervical radiculopathy. A population-based study from Rochester, Minnesota, 1976 through 1990. Brain. 1994;117(Pt 2):325–335. - PubMed
    1. Carette S, Fehlings M G. Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):392–399. - PubMed
    1. Spurling R G, Segerberg L H. Lateral intervertebral disk lesions in the lower cervical region. J Am Med Assoc. 1953;151(5):354–359. - PubMed
    1. Räsänen P, Ohman J, Sintonen H. et al.Cost-utility analysis of routine neurosurgical spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;5(3):204–209. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources