Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 13;3(6):307-13.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.100. eCollection 2014 Nov.

Economic inequality in eye care utilization and its determinants: a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition

Affiliations

Economic inequality in eye care utilization and its determinants: a Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition

Mohammad Hassan Emamian et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: The current study aimed to determine eye care utilization, to assess the role of economic inequality in the utilization of eye care services, and to identify its determinants in Shahroud, North of Iran.

Methods: Of the 6,311 invited people, 5,190 (82.24%) individuals aged 40 to 64 years old participated in the study. A history of a visit by an ophthalmologist or optometrist was considered as eye care utilization. The gap between low- and high-economic groups was decomposed into its determinants using the Oaxaca decomposition method.

Results: Among the participants, 16.32% [95% Confidence Intervals (CI)= 15.31-17.33%] had never been examined by an ophthalmologist or optometrist, and 30.94% (95% CI= 29.69-32.20%) had not undergone an eye examination in the past 5 years. This negative history was significantly higher among female subjects [Odds Ratio (OR)= 1.79, 95% CI= 1.51-2.14], the low-economic group (OR= 2.33, 95% CI= 1.90-2.87), the visually impaired (OR= 1.41, 95% CI= 1.05-1.90), and the uninsured (OR= 1.93, 95% CI= 1.45-2.58). The negative history of eye examination decreased with increasing in age (OR= 0.94, 95% CI= 0.93-0.96) and education (OR= 0.94, 95% CI= 0.92-0.96). In this study, 24.72% (95% CI= 22.30-27.14) of the low-economic group and 9.94% (95% CI= 8.75-11.14) of the high-economic group had no history of eye examination. Decomposition of the gap between the two economic groups showed that education and gender were the most important determinants of inequality.

Conclusion: A considerable percentage of adults, even those with visual impairment, do not receive appropriate eye care. There is a definite economic inequality in the community for which poverty per se could be the major cause.

Keywords: Eye; Health Status Disparities; Inequality; Iran.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Initiative for the Elimination of Avoidable Blindness: action plan 2006-2011. Geneva: WHO; 2007.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Eye-care utilization among women aged > or =40 years with eye diseases – 19 states, 2006-2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:588–91. - PubMed
    1. Dandona R, Dandona L, Naduvilath TJ, McCarty CA, Rao GN. Utilisation of eyecare services in an urban population in southern India: the Andhra Pradesh eye disease study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000;84:22–7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.1.22. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. du Toit R, Ramke J, Naduvilath T, Brian G. Awareness and use of eye care services in Fiji. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2006;13:309–20. doi: 10.1080/09286580600826629. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, Mohammad K. Eye care utilization patterns in Tehran population: a population based cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2006;6:4. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources