Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 27;3(6):315-21.
doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2014.109. eCollection 2014 Nov.

An audit of the knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards Surgical Informed Consent (SIC)

Affiliations

An audit of the knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards Surgical Informed Consent (SIC)

Bushra Ashraf et al. Int J Health Policy Manag. .

Abstract

Background: The Surgical Informed Consent (SIC) is a comprehensive process that establishes an information-based agreement between the patient and his doctor to undertake a clearly outlined medical or surgical intervention. It is neither a casual formality nor a casually signed piece of paper. The present study was designed to audit the current knowledge and attitudes of doctors towards SIC at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Pakistan.

Methods: This cross-sectional qualitative investigation was conducted under the auspices of the Department of Medical Education (DME), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences (PIMS), Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University (SZABMU), Islamabad over three months period. A 19-item questionnaire was employed for data collection. The participants were selected at random from the list of the surgeons maintained in the hospital and approached face-to-face with the help of a team of junior doctors detailed for questionnaire distribution among them. The target was to cover over 50% of these doctors by convenience sampling.

Results: Out of 231 respondents, there were 32 seniors while 199 junior doctors, constituting a ratio of 1:6.22. The respondents variably responded to the questions regarding various attributes of the process of SIC. Overall, the junior doctors performed poorer compared to the seniors.

Conclusion: The knowledge and attitudes of our doctors particularly the junior ones, towards the SIC are less than ideal. This results in their failure to avail this golden opportunity of doctor-patient communication to guide their patients through a solidly informative and legally valid SIC. They are often unaware of the essential preconditions of the SIC; provide incomplete information to their patients; and quite often do not ensure direct involvement of their patients in the process. Additionally they lack an understanding of using interactive computer-based programs as well as the concept of nocebo effect of informed consent.

Keywords: Consent; Nocebo Effect of Informed Consent; Surgery; Surgical Informed Consent (SIC).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Leclercq WK, Keulers BJ, Scheltinga MR, Spauwen PH, van der Wilt GJ. A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future A quest to help patients make better decisions. World J Surg. 2010;34:1406–15. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0542-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saaiq M, Zaman KU. Casual consent to treatment: a neglected issue in our health care system. Ann Pak Inst Med Sci. 2006;2:207–12.
    1. Leclercq WK, Keulers BJ, Houterman S, Veerman M, Legemaate J, Scheltinga MR. A survey of the current practice of the informed consent process in general surgery in the Netherlands. Patient Saf Surg. 2013;7:4. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wheeler R. Consent in surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88:261–4. doi: 10.1308/003588406X106315. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ochieng J, Ibingira C, Buwembo W, Munabi I, Kiryowa H, Kitara D. et al. Informed consent practices for surgical care at university teaching hospitals; a case in a low resource setting. BMC Med Ethics. 2014;15:40. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-40. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources