Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Nov;93(22):e122.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000122.

Radiofrequency ablation versus reresection in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Radiofrequency ablation versus reresection in treating recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

Hao Cai et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Treatment for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) remains controversial. This study tried to compare survival benefits between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and reresection for RHCC patients following curative surgical treatments.Databases were searched for comparative studies published from 2008 to 2014 on RFA versus reresection in treating RHCC. Meta-analysis was performed using a random or fixed-effect model to compare the overall survivals (OSs) and disease-free survivals (DFSs) between RFA and reresection. Begg funnel plot and Egger test were performed to assess the publication bias.Six retrospective comparative studies fulfilled our criteria and were included. For patients with RHCC, RFA was equivalent to reresection in 1-year OSs (odds ratio [OR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50-1.49; P = 0.587), 3-year OSs (OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.64-1.28; P = 0.581), and 5-year OSs (OR 0.97; 95% CI, 0.69-1.36; P = 0.846). However, reresection was superior to RFA in 3-year DFSs (OR 2.25; 95% CI, 1.37-3.68; P = 0.001) and 5-year DFSs (OR 3.70; 95% CI, 1.98-6.93; P = 0.000). The outcome of 1-year DFSs was unstable with statistical heterogeneity among studies included in meta-analysis (I = 77.4%). No evidence of publication bias was found. RFA was considered as a less invasive modality for RHCC patients.RFA achieves comparable OSs as reresection in the treatment of RHCC, with lower postoperative complications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Forest plots showing the pooled result of 1-year OS. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, OS = overall survival.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Forest plots showing the pooled result of 3-year overall survival. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, OS = overall survival.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Forest plots showing the pooled result of 5-year overall survival. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio, OS = overall survival.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Forest plots showing the pooled result of 1-year disease-free survival. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Forest plots showing the pooled result of 3-year disease-free survival. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Forest plots showing the pooled result of 5-year disease-free survival. CI = confidence interval, OR = odds ratio.

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 10 [Internet]. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2010. http://globocan.iarc.fr Accessed February 1, 2014.
    1. Taylor-Robinson SD, Foster GR, Arora S, et al. Increase in primary liver cancer in the UK. Lancet. 1997;350:1142–1143. - PubMed
    1. El-Serag HB, Mason AC. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:745–750. - PubMed
    1. Bruix J, Sherman M. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology. 2011;53:1020–1022. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roayaie S, Obeidat K, Sposito C, et al. Resection of hepatocellular cancer </=2 cm: results from two Western centers. Hepatology. 2013;57:1426–1435. - PMC - PubMed