Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;93(22):e94.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000094.

Surgical treatment and clinical outcome of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a 14-year experience from one single center

Affiliations

Surgical treatment and clinical outcome of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a 14-year experience from one single center

Min Yang et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 Nov.

Erratum in

Abstract

Our primary aim of the present study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and surgical outcome of nonfunctional pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (non-F-P-NETs), with an emphasis on evaluating the prognostic value of the newly updated 2010 grading classification of the World Health Organization (WHO).Data of 55 consecutive patients who were surgically treated and pathologically diagnosed as non-F-P-NETs in our single institution from January 2000 to December 2013 were retrospectively collected.This entirety comprised of 55 patients (31 males and 24 females), with a mean age of 51.24 ± 12.95 years. Manifestations of non-F-P-NETs were nonspecific. Distal pancreatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and local resection of pancreatic tumor were the most frequent surgical procedures, while pancreatic fistula was the most common but acceptable complication (30.3%). The overall 5-year survival rate of this entire cohort was 41.0%, with a median survival time of 60.4 months. Patients who underwent R0 resections obtained a better survival than those who did not (P < 0.005). As for the prognostic analysis, tumor size and lymph invasion were only statistically significant in univariate analysis (P = 0.046 and P < 0.05, respectively), whereas the newly updated 2010 grading classification of WHO (G1 and G2 vs G3), distant metastasis, and surgical margin were all meaningful in both univariate and multivariate analysis (P = 0.045, 0.001, and 0.042, respectively).Non-F-P-NETs are a kind of rare neoplasm, with mostly indolent malignancy. Patients with non-F-P-NETs could benefit from the radical resections. The new WHO criteria, distant metastasis and surgical margin, might be independent predictors for the prognosis of non-F-P-NETs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overall 5-year survival rate of patients with non-F-P-NETs who underwent an operation was 41.0%, with a median overall survival time of 60.4 months (95% confidence interval, 20.9–99.8 months).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Comparison of survival for non-F-P-NETs with different resections. Survival time of patients who underwent R0 resection was statistically longer than that of patients who did not, whose median survival time was 60.43 and 7.40 months, respectively (P < 0.001).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Comparison of survival for p-NETs in different stage. Survival time of patients in stage I was longer than those in stages III and IV (P = 0.049 and 0.034, respectively), while no notable differences were found between stages I and II (P = 0.705). Also, patients in stage II obtained better survival than those in stages III and IV (P < 0.005 and P < 0.005, respectively), as well as that between stages III and IV (P = 0.042).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Comparison of survival for non-F-P-NETs with different WHO new grading classifications. Survival time of patients between NET G1 and NEC G3, NET G2 and NEC G3 were significant (P = 0.029 and 0.021, respectively), whereas that between NET G1 and NET G2 present no significant difference (P = 0.146).

References

    1. Pape UF, Bohmig M, Berndt U, et al. Survival and clinical outcome of patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic tract in a German referral center. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004;1014:222–233. - PubMed
    1. Ito T, Sasano H, Tanaka M, et al. Epidemiological study of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors in Japan. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:234–243. - PubMed
    1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3063–3072. - PubMed
    1. Halfdanarson TR, Rabe KG, Rubin J, et al. Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs): incidence, prognosis and recent trend toward improved survival. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:1727–1733. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turaga KK, Kvols LK. Recent progress in the understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:113–132. - PubMed

Supplementary concepts