Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Nov 14;9(11):e112062.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112062. eCollection 2014.

Is early oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery feasible? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Xiaoping Liu  1 , Da Wang  2 , Liansheng Zheng  2 , Tingyu Mou  2 , Hao Liu  2 , Guoxin Li  2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Is early oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery feasible? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Xiaoping Liu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Aim: To assess the feasibility and safety of early oral feeding (EOF) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Methods: A literature search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane library databases was performed for eligible studies published between January 1995 and March 2014. Systematic review was carried out to identify randomized controlled trials comparing EOF and traditional postoperative oral feeding after gastric cancer surgery. Meta-analyses were performed by either a fixed effects model or a random effects model according to the heterogeneity using RevMan 5.2 software.

Results: Six studies remained for final analysis. Included studies were published between 2005 and 2013 reporting on a total of 454 patients. No significant differences were observed for postoperative complication (RR = 0.95; 95%CI, 0.70 to 1.29; P = 0.75), the tolerability of oral feeding (RR = 0.98; 95%CI, 0.91 to 1.06; P = 0.61), readmission rate (RR = 1; 95%CI, 0.30 to 3.31; P = 1.00) and incidence of anastomotic leakage (RR = 0.31; 95%CI, 0.01 to 7.30; P = 0.47) between two groups. EOF after gastrectomy for gastric cancer was associated with significant shorter duration of the hospital stay (WMD = -2.36; 95%CI, -3.37 to -1.34; P<0.0001) and time to first flatus (WMD = -19.94; 95%CI, -32.03 to -7.84; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative complication, tolerability of oral feeding, readmission rates, duration of hospital stay and time to first flatus among subgroups stratified by the time to start EOF or by partial and total gastrectomy or by laparoscopic and open surgery.

Conclusions: The result of this meta-analysis showed that EOF after gastric cancer surgery seems feasible and safe, even started at the day of surgery irrespective of the extent of the gastric resection and the type of surgery. However, more prospective, well-designed multicenter RCTs with more clinical outcomes are needed for further validation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow chart of studies identified, included and excluded following PRISMA statement.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Risk of bias graph.
Judgements about each risk of bias item presented in all include RCTs(A) and for each included RCT(B).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Forest plot displaying the results of the meta-analysis.
A. postoperative complication; B. the tolerability of oral feeding; C. readmission rate. RR: Risk ratio; WMD: Weighted mean difference. CI: confidence intervals.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Forest plot displaying the results of the meta-analysis.
A. the duration of hospital stay; B. time of first flatus; C. incidence of anastomotic leakage. RR: Risk ratio; WMD: Weighted mean difference. CI: confidence intervals.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Funnel plot of the studies reporting on postoperative complication.
RR: risk ratio; SE: standard error.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248: 189–198. - PubMed
    1. Feo CV, Romanini B, Sortini D, Ragazzi R, Zamboni P, et al. (2004) Early oral feeding after colorectal resection: a randomized controlled study. ANZ J Surg 74: 298–301. - PubMed
    1. Zhuang CL, Ye XZ, Zhang CJ, Dong QT, Chen BC, et al. (2013) Early versus traditional postoperative oral feeding in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Dig Surg 30: 225–232. - PubMed
    1. Gianotti L, Nespoli L, Torselli L, Panelli M, Nespoli A (2011) Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. Int J Colorectal Dis 26: 747–753. - PubMed
    1. de Martel C, Forman D, Plummer M (2013) Gastric cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 42: 219–240. - PubMed

Publication types