Considerations on an approach for establishing a framework for bioactive food components
- PMID: 25398732
- PMCID: PMC4224206
- DOI: 10.3945/an.114.006312
Considerations on an approach for establishing a framework for bioactive food components
Abstract
Bioactive food components have shown potential health benefits for more than a decade. Currently there are no recommended levels of intake [i.e., Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs)] as there are for nutrients and fiber. DRIs for essential nutrients were based on requirements for each specific nutrient to maintain normal physiologic or biochemical function and to prevent signs of deficiency and adverse clinical effects. They were later expanded to include criteria for reducing the risk of chronic degenerative diseases for some nutrients. There are many challenges for establishing recommendations for intakes of nonessential food components. Although some nonessential food components have shown health benefits and are safe, validated biomarkers of disease risk reduction are lacking for many. Biomarkers of intake (exposure) are limited in number, especially because the bioactive compounds responsible for beneficial effects have not yet been identified or are unknown. Furthermore, given this lack of characterization of composition in a variety of foods, it is difficult to ascertain intakes of nonessential food components, especially with the use of food-frequency questionnaires designed for estimating intakes of nutrients. Various intermediary markers that may predict disease outcome have been used as functional criteria in the DRI process. However, few validated surrogate endpoints of chronic disease risk exist. Nonvalidated intermediary biomarkers of risk may possibly predict clinical outcomes, but more research is needed to confirm the associations between cause and effect. One criterion for establishing acceptable intermediary outcome indicators may be the maintenance of normal physiologic function throughout adulthood, which presumably would lead to reduced chronic disease risk. Multiple biomarkers of outcomes that demonstrate the same health benefit may also be helpful. It would be beneficial to continue to refine the process of setting DRIs by convening a workshop on establishing a framework for nonessential food components that would take into consideration intermediary biomarkers indicative of optimal health.
© 2014 American Society for Nutrition.
Conflict of interest statement
Author disclosures: K. Ellwood received an honorarium for taking the lead on the writing of this manuscript; D. A. Balentine, J. T. Dwyer, and J. W. Erdman Jr. all serve on the Board of Trustees for the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America but are not compensated for their role. These 3 authors, along with C. L. Kwik-Uribe, are all actively involved with the ILSI North America Committee on Bioactives and receive no compensation for their involvement. P. C. Gaine was formerly employed by ILSI North America.
Figures
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes: the essential guide to nutrient requirements. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2006.
-
- Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for calcium and vitamin D. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
-
- Taylor CL. Framework for DRI development: components “known” and components “to be explored”. Washington: Institute of Medicine; 2011.
-
- Institute of Medicine. The development of DRIs 1994–2004: lessons learned and new challenges: workshop summary. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2008.
-
- Institute of Medicine. Dietary Reference Intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2005. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical