Extent, location, and clinical significance of non-infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
- PMID: 25399277
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.15095
Extent, location, and clinical significance of non-infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
Abstract
Importance: Little information exists about the anatomical characteristics and clinical relevance of non-infarct-related artery (IRA) disease among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Objectives: To investigate the incidence, extent, and location of obstructive non-IRA disease and compare 30-day mortality according to the presence of non-IRA disease in patients with STEMI.
Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective study of patients pooled from a convenience sample of 8 independent, international, randomized STEMI clinical trials published between 1993 and 2007. Follow-up varied from 1 month to 1 year. Among 68,765 patients enrolled in the trials, 28,282 patients with valid angiographic information were included in this analysis. Obstructive coronary artery disease was defined as stenosis of 50% or more of the diameter of a major epicardial artery. To assess the generalizability of trial-based results, external validation was performed using observational data for patients with STEMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) (between November 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013; n = 18,217) and the Duke Cardiovascular Databank (between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2012; n = 1812).
Main outcomes and measures: Thirty-day mortality following STEMI.
Results: Overall, 52.8% (14,929 patients) had obstructive non-IRA disease; 29.6% involved 1 vessel and 18.8% involved 2 vessels. There was no substantial difference in the extent and distribution of non-IRA disease according to the IRA territory. Unadjusted and adjusted rates of 30-day mortality were significantly higher in patients with non-IRA disease than in those without non-IRA disease (unadjusted, 4.3% vs 1.7%, respectively; risk difference, 2.7% [95% CI, 2.3% to 3.0%], P < .001; and adjusted, 3.3% vs 1.9%, respectively; risk difference, 1.4% [95% CI, 1.0% to 1.8%], P < .001). The overall prevalence and association of non-IRA disease with 30-day mortality was consistent with findings from the KAMIR registry (adjusted, 3.6% for patients with non-IRA disease vs 2.5% in those without it; risk difference, 1.1% [95% CI, 0.6% to 1.7%]; P < .001), but not with the Duke database (adjusted, 4.7% with non-IRA disease vs 4.3% without it; risk difference, 0.4% [95% CI, -1.4% to 2.2%], P = .65).
Conclusions and relevance: In a retrospective pooled analysis of 8 clinical trials, obstructive non-IRA disease was common among patients presenting with STEMI, and was associated with a modest statistically significant increase in 30-day mortality. These findings require confirmation in prospectively designed studies, but raise questions about the appropriateness and timing of non-IRA revascularization in patients with STEMI.
Similar articles
-
Impact of Non-Infarct-Related Artery Disease on Infarct Size and Outcomes (from the CRISP-AMI Trial).Am J Med. 2016 Dec;129(12):1307-1315. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 16. Am J Med. 2016. PMID: 27542611
-
Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Feb 27;71(8):844-856. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.028. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29471935
-
Comparison of infarct-related artery vs multivessel revascularization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: analysis from Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry.Cardiol J. 2012;19(3):256-66. doi: 10.5603/cj.2012.0047. Cardiol J. 2012. PMID: 22641544
-
Multivessel Revascularization Does Not Increase Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Incidence in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2016 Dec;16(6):419-426. doi: 10.1007/s40256-016-0184-1. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2016. PMID: 27580997 Review.
-
Impact of percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic total occlusion in the non-infarct-related artery in patients with STEMI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022 Dec;56(1):157-165. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2022.2085319. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2022. PMID: 35674511
Cited by
-
Multivessel vs. culprit vessel-only percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 24;9:992456. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.992456. eCollection 2022. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 36505378 Free PMC article.
-
Complete revascularization in acute myocardial infarction: a clinical review.Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023 Apr;38(2):177-186. doi: 10.1007/s12928-022-00907-6. Epub 2023 Jan 7. Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2023. PMID: 36609898 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Preventive Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction - The Primacy of Randomised Trials.Interv Cardiol. 2015 Mar;10(1):32-34. doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.32. Interv Cardiol. 2015. PMID: 29588671 Free PMC article.
-
Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017 Nov;14(11):665-678. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.88. Epub 2017 Jun 29. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28660892 Review.
-
Functional or anatomical assessment of non-culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction.EuroIntervention. 2025 Feb 17;21(4):e217-e228. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00720. EuroIntervention. 2025. PMID: 39962948
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical