Running suture versus interrupted suture for vesicourethral anastomosis in retropubic radical prostatectomy: a randomized study
- PMID: 25400263
- DOI: 10.1111/iju.12667
Running suture versus interrupted suture for vesicourethral anastomosis in retropubic radical prostatectomy: a randomized study
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the feasibility of vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture during retropubic radical prostatectomy and to compare the surgical outcomes of vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture with those of the standard interrupted suture technique.
Methods: A total of 60 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy from 2010 to 2012 at the Yamaguchi University Hospital, Japan were included in the present study, and were randomly assigned to vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture (n = 30 patients) or a standard interrupted suture technique group (n = 30 patients). Vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture was carried out with 12-bite sutures using 3-0 poliglecaprone. The primary end-point was the time to catheter removal. Patients' health-related quality of life was assessed using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite in 56 patients (28 patients in each group).
Results: No significant difference was found in the median suturing time between the two study groups (both 19 min, P = 0.449). The time to catheter removal was significantly better in the vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture group (hazard ratio 5.23, 95% confidence interval 1.73-17.65, P = 0.003). The pad-free rate was significantly higher in the vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture group at 1 month after surgery (20.7% vs 3.3%, P = 0.0463); however, there was no significant difference at 3 months and beyond. The Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite urinary and bowel summary scores at 1 month were significantly better in the vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture patients (both P < 0.01), though no significant difference was observed thereafter. A vesicourethral anastomosis stricture was noted in three patients (10%) in the standard interrupted suture technique group, and none in the vesicourethral anastomosis using running suture group.
Conclusion: Running suture for vesicourethral anastomosis is feasible during retropubic radical prostatectomy. Furthermore, it offers better outcomes than the conventional standard interrupted suture technique, with a higher likelihood of improvement in patients' health-related quality of life.
Keywords: Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite; randomized controlled study; retropubic prostatectomy; running suture; vesicourethral anastomosis.
© 2014 The Japanese Urological Association.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of perioperative outcomes between running versus interrupted vesicourethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy: A single-surgeon experience.Korean J Urol. 2015 Jun;56(6):443-8. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.6.443. Epub 2015 Jun 1. Korean J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26078841 Free PMC article.
-
Running suture for vesicourethral anastomosis in minilaparotomy radical retropubic prostatectomy.Urology. 2006 Feb;67(2):410-2. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.003. Urology. 2006. PMID: 16461099
-
Single Running Suture versus Single-Knot Running Suture for Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Prospective Randomised Comparative Study.Urol Int. 2015;95(4):445-51. doi: 10.1159/000438829. Epub 2015 Aug 22. Urol Int. 2015. PMID: 26655169 Clinical Trial.
-
Interrupted versus Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis During Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Nov;5(6):980-991. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 13. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. PMID: 29907547
-
Comparison of the modified vest and the direct anastomosis for radical retropubic prostatectomy.Urology. 1997 May;49(5):732-6. doi: 10.1016/S0090-4295(97)00066-6. Urology. 1997. PMID: 9145979 Review.
Cited by
-
A Pragmatic Randomized Trial Comparing Suturing Techniques for Vesicourethral Anastomosis: One-Year Voiding Function Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy.J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 3;14(11):3934. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113934. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40507695 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical Analysis Methods and Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials for Cancer Conducted in Japan: A Systematic Review.Cureus. 2024 May 21;16(5):e60804. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60804. eCollection 2024 May. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38910767 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early Continence and Extravasation After Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy - Interrupted vs Continuous Suturing for Vesicourethral Anastomosis.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020 Dec 23;16:1289-1296. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S278454. eCollection 2020. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020. PMID: 33380800 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized controlled trial comparing open anterograde anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy with retrograde technique.Asian J Urol. 2023 Apr;10(2):151-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.008. Epub 2021 Nov 25. Asian J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36942119 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical