Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17356-62.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400229111. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

Dealing with femtorisks in international relations

Affiliations

Dealing with femtorisks in international relations

Aaron Benjamin Frank et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The contemporary global community is increasingly interdependent and confronted with systemic risks posed by the actions and interactions of actors existing beneath the level of formal institutions, often operating outside effective governance structures. Frequently, these actors are human agents, such as rogue traders or aggressive financial innovators, terrorists, groups of dissidents, or unauthorized sources of sensitive or secret information about government or private sector activities. In other instances, influential "actors" take the form of climate change, communications technologies, or socioeconomic globalization. Although these individual forces may be small relative to state governments or international institutions, or may operate on long time scales, the changes they catalyze can pose significant challenges to the analysis and practice of international relations through the operation of complex feedbacks and interactions of individual agents and interconnected systems. We call these challenges "femtorisks," and emphasize their importance for two reasons. First, in isolation, they may be inconsequential and semiautonomous; but when embedded in complex adaptive systems, characterized by individual agents able to change, learn from experience, and pursue their own agendas, the strategic interaction between actors can propel systems down paths of increasing, even global, instability. Second, because their influence stems from complex interactions at interfaces of multiple systems (e.g., social, financial, political, technological, ecological, etc.), femtorisks challenge standard approaches to risk assessment, as higher-order consequences cascade across the boundaries of socially constructed complex systems. We argue that new approaches to assessing and managing systemic risk in international relations are required, inspired by principles of evolutionary theory and development of resilient ecological systems.

Keywords: complex adaptive systems; contagion; resilience; risk analysis; systemic risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Jervis R. System Effects: Complexity in Political and Social Life. Princeton Univ Press; Princeton, NJ: 1998.
    1. Stein A. Why Nations Cooperate. Cornell Univ Press; Ithaca, NY: 1990.
    1. Simon H. The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press; Cambridge, MA: 1996.
    1. Perrow C (1984) Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies (Princeton Univ Press, Princeton, NJ)
    1. Keohane R, Nye J. Power and Interdependence. Longman Classics in Political Science; Boston: 2011.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources