Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 18:7:523.
doi: 10.1186/s13071-014-0523-5.

Tracking the mutual shaping of the technical and social dimensions of solar-powered mosquito trapping systems (SMoTS) for malaria control on Rusinga Island, western Kenya

Prisca A Oria  1   2 , Alexandra Hiscox  3 , Jane Alaii  4   5 , Margaret Ayugi  6 , Wolfgang Richard Mukabana  7   8 , Willem Takken  9 , Cees Leeuwis  10
Affiliations

Tracking the mutual shaping of the technical and social dimensions of solar-powered mosquito trapping systems (SMoTS) for malaria control on Rusinga Island, western Kenya

Prisca A Oria et al. Parasit Vectors. .

Abstract

Background: There has been increasing effort in recent years to incorporate user needs in technology design and re-design. This project employed a bottom-up approach that engaged end users from the outset. Bottom-up approaches have the potential to bolster novel interventions and move them towards adaptive and evidence-based strategies. The present study concerns an innovative use of solar-powered mosquito trapping systems (SMoTS) to control malaria in western Kenya. Our paper highlights the co-dependence of research associated with the development of the SMoTS technology on one hand and research for enhancing the sustainable uptake of that very same intervention within the community on the other.

Methods: During the pre-intervention year, we examined the design, re-design and piloting of a novel technology to generate lessons for malaria elimination on Rusinga Island. Initial ideas about many technological necessities were evaluated and re-designed following feedback from various sources, including technical and social research as well as broader interactions with the social environment. We documented the interlocking of the multiple processes and activities that took place through process observation and document reviews. We analysed the data within the conceptual framework of system innovation by identifying mutual shaping between technical and social factors.

Results: Our findings illustrate how various project stakeholders including project staff, collaborators, donor, and community members simultaneously pursued interdependent technological transformations and social interests. In the ongoing process, we observed how partial outcomes in the technological domain influenced social events at a later phase and vice versa.

Conclusions: Looking at malaria intervention projects employing novel technologies as niches that may evolve towards system innovation, helps to reveal interrelations between the various technical and social aspects. Revealing these interrelations requires a different role for research and different perspective on innovation where innovation is more than the technical aspects. This approach therefore requires that research is designed in a way that enables obtaining feedback from both aspects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Model house with SMoTS installed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cross-sectional diagram of the Suna mosquito trap (source: Hiscox et al. Malaria Journal 2014 13:257 doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-257).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Suna trap with a plastic base with fine holes.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. MacKenzie D, Wajcman J. The Social Shaping of Technology. Buckingham [England]; Philadelphia: Open University Press; 1999.
    1. Schot J, Geels FW. Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technol Anal Strateg. 2008;20(5):537–554. doi: 10.1080/09537320802292651. - DOI
    1. Geels F. Co-evolution of technology and society: the transition in water supply and personal hygiene in the Netherlands (1850–1930) a case study in multi-level perspective. Technol Soc. 2005;27(3):363–397. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.008. - DOI
    1. Reis EC, Goepp JG, Katz S, Santosham M. Barriers to use of oral rehydration therapy. Pediatrics. 1994;93(5):708–711. - PubMed
    1. Coreil J, Genece E. Adoption of oral rehydration therapy among Haitian mothers. Soc Sci Med. 1988;27(1):87–96. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90166-9. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types