Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov 18;5(5):677-84.
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v5.i5.677.

Treatment for cartilage injuries of the knee with a new treatment algorithm

Affiliations
Review

Treatment for cartilage injuries of the knee with a new treatment algorithm

Ahmet Ozmeriç et al. World J Orthop. .

Abstract

Treatment of articular cartilage injuries to the knee remains a considerable challenge today. Current procedures succeed in providing relief of symptoms, however damaged articular tissue is not replaced with new tissue of the same biomechanical properties and long-term durability as normal hyaline cartilage. Despite many arthroscopic procedures that often manage to achieve these goals, results are far from perfect and there is no agreement on which of these procedures are appropriate, particularly when full-thickness chondral defects are considered.Therefore, the search for biological solution in long-term functional healing and increasing the quality of wounded cartilage has been continuing. For achieving this goal and apply in wide defects, scaffolds are developed.The rationale of using a scaffold is to create an environment with biodegradable polymers for the in vitro growth of living cells and their subsequent implantation into the lesion area. Previously a few numbers of surgical treatment algorithm was described in reports, however none of them contained one-step or two -steps scaffolds. The ultimate aim of this article was to review various arthroscopic treatment options for different stage lesions and develop a new treatment algorithm which included the scaffolds.

Keywords: Autologous chondrocyte implantation; Chondral lesion; Microfracture; Osteochondral transplantation; Scaffolds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
In small defects in high-demand patients, autologous osteochondral transplantation seems to be a reliable treatment alternative. AOT: Autologous osteochondral transplantation; ACI: Autologous chondrocyte implantation; MACI: Matrix-induced chondrocyte implantation; OAT: Osteochondral allograft transplantation; AMIM: Acellular matrix-induced microfracture.

References

    1. Hunter W. Of the structure and disease of articulating cartilages. 1743. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;(317):3–6. - PubMed
    1. Magnussen RA, Dunn WR, Carey JL, Spindler KP. Treatment of focal articular cartilage defects in the knee: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:952–962. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Frisbie DD, Oxford JT, Southwood L, Trotter GW, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, Goodnight JL, McIlwraith CW. Early events in cartilage repair after subchondral bone microfracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;(407):215–227. - PubMed
    1. Prakash D, Learmonth D. Natural progression of osteo-chondral defect in the femoral condyle. Knee. 2002;9:7–10. - PubMed
    1. Kock NB, Smolders JM, van Susante JL, Buma P, van Kampen A, Verdonschot N. A cadaveric analysis of contact stress restoration after osteochondral transplantation of a cylindrical cartilage defect. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:461–468. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources