Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 19;369(1656):20130584.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0584.

Application of in silico and in vitro methods in the development of adverse outcome pathway constructs in wildlife

Affiliations

Application of in silico and in vitro methods in the development of adverse outcome pathway constructs in wildlife

Judith C Madden et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

There is a long history of using both in silico and in vitro methods to predict adverse effects in humans and environmental species where toxicity data are lacking. Currently, there is a great deal of interest in applying these methods to the development of so-called 'adverse outcome pathway' (AOP) constructs. The AOP approach provides a framework for organizing information at the chemical and biological level, allowing evidence from both in silico and in vitro studies to be rationally combined to fill gaps in knowledge concerning toxicological events. Fundamental to this new paradigm is a greater understanding of the mechanisms of toxicity and, in particular, where these mechanisms may be conserved across taxa, such as between model animals and related wild species. This presents an opportunity to make predictions across diverse species, where empirical data are unlikely to become available as is the case for most species of wildlife.

Keywords: adverse outcome pathway; in silico modelling; in vitro techniques; predictive toxicology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Representation of the key features of a ‘source to outcome’ and ‘AOP’. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Binding of an electrophile to a nucleophilic group of a protein demonstrating that the same MIE can result in different toxicities in different species.

References

    1. Ankley GT, et al. 2010. Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 29, 730–741. (10.1002/etc.34) - DOI - PubMed
    1. OECD 2012. Proposal for a template and guidance on developing and assessing the completeness of adverse outcome pathways See http://www.oecd.org/env/ehs/testing/49963554.pdf.
    1. Vinken M. 2013. The adverse outcome pathway concept: a pragmatic tool in toxicology. Toxicology 312, 158–165. (10.1016/j.tox.2013.08.011) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schultz TW. 2010. Adverse outcome pathways: a way of linking chemical structure to in vivo toxicological hazards. In In silico toxicology: principles and applications (eds Cronin MTD, Madden JC.), pp. 346–371. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry.
    1. Landesmann B, Goumenou M, Munn S, Whelan M. 2012. Description of prototype modes-of-action related to repeated dose toxicity. JRC Scientific and Policy Report 75689. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources