Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov 19;9(11):e111927.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111927. eCollection 2014.

Overexpression of Mcl-1L splice variant is associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in oral cancers

Affiliations

Overexpression of Mcl-1L splice variant is associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in oral cancers

Vinayak Palve et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Altered expression of Mcl-1, an anti-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, has been linked to the progression and outcome of a variety of malignancies. We have previously reported the overexpression of Mcl-1 protein in human oral cancers. The present study aimed to evaluate the clinicopathological significance of the expression of three known Mcl-1 isoforms in oral tumors and the effect of targeting Mcl-1L isoform on chemosensitivity of oral cancer cells.

Methods: The expression of Mcl-1 isoforms- Mcl-1L, Mcl-1S & Mcl-1ES was analyzed in 130 paired oral tumors and 9 oral cell lines using quantitative real-time PCR & protein by western blotting. The Mcl-1 mRNA levels were correlated with clinicopathological parameters and outcome of oral cancer patients. The effect of Mcl-1L shRNA or Obatoclax (a small molecule Mcl-1 inhibitor), in combination with Cisplatin on chemosensitivity of oral cancer cells was also assessed.

Results: Anti-apoptotic Mcl-1L was predominantly expressed, over low or undetectable pro-apoptotic Mcl-1S and Mcl-1ES isoforms. The Mcl-1L transcripts were significantly overexpressed in all cancer cell lines and in 64% oral tumors versus adjacent normals (P<0.02). In oral cancer patients, high Mcl-1L expression was significantly associated with node positivity (P = 0.021), advanced tumor size (P = 0.013) and poor overall survival (P = 0.002). Multivariate analysis indicated Mcl-1L to be an independent prognostic factor for oral cancers (P = 0.037). Mcl-1L shRNA knockdown or its inhibition by Obatoclax in combination with Cisplatin synergistically reduced viability and growth of oral cancer cells than either treatment alone.

Conclusion: Our studies suggest that overexpression of Mcl-1L is associated with poor prognosis and chemoresistance in oral cancers. Mcl-1L is an independent prognostic factor and a potential therapeutic target in oral cancers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Expression of Mcl-1 isoforms in oral cell lines.
(a) Expression of Mcl-1L & Mcl-1S mRNA in oral cell lines; Mcl-1 ES levels were undetectable (* P≤0.03) (b) Mcl-1L protein expression in oral cell lines.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Correlation of Mcl-1L mRNA expression in oral normal versus tumor tissues.
(a) Expression of Mcl-1L mRNA in normal vs. oral tumors of different subsites (* P≤0.02); (b) Mcl-1L protein expression in adjacent normal versus tumors.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Survival analysis of oral cancer patients.
(a-c) Kaplan–Meier estimates of overall survival of oral cancer patients with low or high expression of Mcl-1 isoforms; (d) Multivariate analysis of oral cancer patients.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Down regulation of Mcl-1L expression in oral cancer cell lines.
(a & b) shRNA mediated down regulation of Mcl-1L mRNA & protein in AW8507, UPCI:SCC040 & SCCC29B oral cancer cells as compared to the control.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Estimation of Cisplatin IC50 for seven oral cancer cell lines by MTT assay (a) and the effect of Mcl-1L knockdown and/or Cisplatin on induction of cell death by PI staining (b) (* & δ P<0.05, vs. individual treatments).
Figure 6
Figure 6. Effect of combination of BH3 mimetic Obatoclax and Cisplatin on cell viability & growth.
(a) Confocal microscopic representative images of AW8507 cells post different treatments; (b) Assessment of percent cell viability of oral cancer cells post different treatments by trypan blue dye exclusion assay (* P<0.05, vs. individual treatments); (c) Analysis of proliferation of oral cancer cells after different treatments by MTT assay. (* P<0.05, vs. individual treatments).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dikshit R, Gupta PC, Ramasundarahettige C, Gajalakshmi V, Aleksandrowicz L, et al. (2012) Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet 379: 1807–1816. - PubMed
    1. Coelho KR (2012) Challenges of the oral cancer burden in India. Journal of cancer epidemiology 2012. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reed JC (1999) Dysregulation of apoptosis in cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 17: 2941–2941. - PubMed
    1. Cory S, Adams JM (2002) The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nature Reviews Cancer 2: 647–656. - PubMed
    1. Craig R (2002) MCL1 provides a window on the role of the BCL2 family in cell proliferation, differentiation and tumorigenesis. Leukemia: official journal of the Leukemia Society of America, Leukemia Research Fund, UK 16: 444. - PubMed

MeSH terms