QTLs associated with dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test weight, growth and feed efficiency have little overlap across 4 beef cattle studies
- PMID: 25410110
- PMCID: PMC4253998
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1004
QTLs associated with dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test weight, growth and feed efficiency have little overlap across 4 beef cattle studies
Abstract
Background: The identification of genetic markers associated with complex traits that are expensive to record such as feed intake or feed efficiency would allow these traits to be included in selection programs. To identify large-effect QTL, we performed a series of genome-wide association studies and functional analyses using 50 K and 770 K SNP genotypes scored in 5,133 animals from 4 independent beef cattle populations (Cycle VII, Angus, Hereford and Simmental×Angus) with phenotypes for average daily gain, dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test body weight and residual feed intake.
Results: A total of 5, 6, 11 and 10 significant QTL (defined as 1-Mb genome windows with Bonferroni-corrected P-value<0.05) were identified for average daily gain, dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test body weight and residual feed intake, respectively. The identified QTL were population-specific and had little overlap across the 4 populations. The pleiotropic or closely linked QTL on BTA 7 at 23 Mb identified in the Angus population harbours a promising candidate gene ACSL6 (acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 6), and was the largest effect QTL associated with dry matter intake and mid-test body weight explaining 10.39% and 14.25% of the additive genetic variance, respectively. Pleiotropic or closely linked QTL associated with average daily gain and mid-test body weight were detected on BTA 6 at 38 Mb and BTA 7 at 93 Mb confirming previous reports. No QTL for residual feed intake explained more than 2.5% of the additive genetic variance in any population. Marker-based estimates of heritability ranged from 0.21 to 0.49 for residual feed intake across the 4 populations.
Conclusions: This GWAS study, which is the largest performed for feed efficiency and its component traits in beef cattle to date, identified several large-effect QTL that cumulatively explained a significant percentage of additive genetic variance within each population. Differences in the QTL identified among the different populations may be due to differences in power to detect QTL, environmental variation, or differences in the genetic architecture of trait variation among breeds. These results enhance our understanding of the biology of growth, feed intake and utilisation in beef cattle.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Genome-wide association study for feed efficiency and growth traits in U.S. beef cattle.BMC Genomics. 2017 May 18;18(1):386. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3754-y. BMC Genomics. 2017. PMID: 28521758 Free PMC article.
-
Large-effect pleiotropic or closely linked QTL segregate within and across ten US cattle breeds.BMC Genomics. 2014 Jun 6;15(1):442. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-442. BMC Genomics. 2014. PMID: 24906442 Free PMC article.
-
Primary genome scan to identify putative quantitative trait loci for feedlot growth rate, feed intake, and feed efficiency of beef cattle.J Anim Sci. 2007 Dec;85(12):3170-81. doi: 10.2527/jas.2007-0234. Epub 2007 Aug 20. J Anim Sci. 2007. PMID: 17709790
-
Cell Biology Symposium: genetics of feed efficiency in dairy and beef cattle.J Anim Sci. 2013 Apr;91(4):1594-613. doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5862. Epub 2013 Jan 23. J Anim Sci. 2013. PMID: 23345557 Review.
-
Genetics of efficient feed utilization and national cattle evaluation: a review.Genet Mol Res. 2005 Jun 30;4(2):152-65. Genet Mol Res. 2005. PMID: 16110437 Review.
Cited by
-
Genetic potential for residual feed intake and diet fed during early- to mid-gestation influences post-natal DNA methylation of imprinted genes in muscle and liver tissues in beef cattle.J Anim Sci. 2021 May 1;99(5):skab140. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab140. J Anim Sci. 2021. PMID: 33991189 Free PMC article.
-
Genome-Wide Association Studies for Methane Production in Dairy Cattle.Genes (Basel). 2019 Dec 2;10(12):995. doi: 10.3390/genes10120995. Genes (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31810242 Free PMC article.
-
Combining information from genome-wide association and multi-tissue gene expression studies to elucidate factors underlying genetic variation for residual feed intake in Australian Angus cattle.BMC Genomics. 2019 Dec 6;20(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6270-4. BMC Genomics. 2019. PMID: 31810463 Free PMC article.
-
Identification and Annotation of Potential Function of Regulatory Antisense Long Non-Coding RNAs Related to Feed Efficiency in Bos taurus Bulls.Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 6;21(9):3292. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093292. Int J Mol Sci. 2020. PMID: 32384694 Free PMC article.
-
Heritability and variance component estimation for feed and water intake behaviors of feedlot cattle.J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skad386. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad386. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 37967310 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Koch RM, Swiger LA, Chambers D, Gregory KE. Efficiency of feed use in beef cattle. J Anim Sci. 1963;22:486–494.
-
- Dickerson GE, Kunzi N, Cundiff LV, Koch RM, Arthaud VH, Gregory KE. Selection criteria for efficient beef production. J Anim Sci. 1974;39:659–673.
-
- Archer JA, Richardson EC, Herd RM, Arthur PF. Potential for selection to improve efficiency of feed use in beef cattle: a review. Austr J Agric Res. 1999;50:147–162. doi: 10.1071/A98075. - DOI
-
- Kennedy BW, van der Werf JH, Meuwissen TH. Genetic and statistical properties of residual feed intake. J Anim Sci. 1993;71:3239–3250. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous