Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Dec;31(12):326.
doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0326-8. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

Diagnostic role of circulating YKL-40 in endometrial carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis of seven related studies

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic role of circulating YKL-40 in endometrial carcinoma patients: a meta-analysis of seven related studies

Daye Cheng et al. Med Oncol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

In the past decade, several studies have suggested a possible link between circulating YKL-40 levels and endometrial carcinoma (EC), but have arrived at inconsistent results. Therefore, we conducted the present meta-analysis and aim to disclose a more comprehensive evaluation of the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of YKL-40 in EC. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Science Direct, SpringerLink, EBSCO, Wanfang, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for studies that evaluated the diagnostic value of YKL-40 in endometrial cancer. The STATA software 12.0 and Meta-Disc software were used to test the heterogeneity and to evaluate the overall test performance. A total of seven studies including 234 EC cases and 300 controls were included in our meta-analysis. The summary estimates of YKL-40 for EC diagnosis indicated a moderately high diagnostic accuracy for circulating YKL-40, with a sensitivity of 0.74, a specificity of 0.87, a PLR of 5.74, a NLR of 0.30, a DOR of 19.14, and an AUC of 0.80. On the basis of our meta-analysis, therefore, circulating YKL-40 could be promising and meaningful in the diagnosis of EC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2014 Jan;63(1):11-20 - PubMed
    1. Ann Oncol. 2009 Jan;20(1):71-7 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2012;7(12 ):e51127 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2014;35(3):304-8 - PubMed
    1. Biometrics. 1994 Dec;50(4):1088-101 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources