Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 28;34(5):859-75.
doi: 10.1002/sim.6376. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering

Affiliations

Bayesian dose-finding designs for combination of molecularly targeted agents assuming partial stochastic ordering

Beibei Guo et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

Molecularly targeted agent (MTA) combination therapy is in the early stages of development. When using a fixed dose of one agent in combinations of MTAs, toxicity and efficacy do not necessarily increase with an increasing dose of the other agent. Thus, in dose-finding trials for combinations of MTAs, interest may lie in identifying the optimal biological dose combinations (OBDCs), defined as the lowest dose combinations (in a certain sense) that are safe and have the highest efficacy level meeting a prespecified target. The limited existing designs for these trials use parametric dose-efficacy and dose-toxicity models. Motivated by a phase I/II clinical trial of a combination of two MTAs in patients with pancreatic, endometrial, or colorectal cancer, we propose Bayesian dose-finding designs to identify the OBDCs without parametric model assumptions. The proposed approach is based only on partial stochastic ordering assumptions for the effects of the combined MTAs and uses isotonic regression to estimate partially stochastically ordered marginal posterior distributions of the efficacy and toxicity probabilities. We demonstrate that our proposed method appropriately accounts for the partial ordering constraints, including potential plateaus on the dose-response surfaces, and is computationally efficient. We develop a dose-combination-finding algorithm to identify the OBDCs. We use simulations to compare the proposed designs with an alternative design based on Bayesian isotonic regression transformation and a design based on parametric change-point dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy models and demonstrate desirable operating characteristics of the proposed designs.

Keywords: Bayesian isotonic regression transformation; dose-efficacy surface; dose-toxicity surface; matrix ordering; plateau; post processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
An illustration of dose combinations.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The top three panels are posterior densities of the efficacy probability when two out of three and one out of three responses are observed at combinations (1,1) and (1,2), respectively. The bottom three panels are the corresponding posterior densities when one out of three and two out of three responses are observed at combinations (1,1) and (1,2), respectively. The solid and dotted curves are the density curves at combinations (1,1) and (1,2), respectively. The vertical lines indicate the posterior means, with black representing unconstrained and blue and red representing constrained posterior means, and the solid and dotted lines correspond to combinations (1,1) and (1,2), respectively. The blue solid and red dotted lines overlap on the top right panel; the black and blue solid lines overlap and the black and red dotted lines overlap on the bottom right panel. BIT, Bayesian isotonic regression transformation; PSO II, partial stochastic ordering using sample sizes as weights.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brunetto AT, Kristeleit RS, de Bono JS. Early oncology clinical trial design in the era of molecular-targeted agents. Future Oncology. 2010;6(8):1339–1352. - PubMed
    1. Soria JC, Blay JY, Spano JP, Pivot X, Coscas Y, Khayat D. Added value of molecular targeted agents in oncology. Annals of Oncology. 2011;22(8):1703–1716. - PubMed
    1. Li F, Zhao C, Wang L. Molecular-targeted agents combination therapy for cancer: developments and potentials. International Journal of Cancer. 2014;134(6):1257–1269. - PubMed
    1. Thall P, Millikan RE, Müller P, Lee S-J. Dose-finding with two agents in phase I oncology trials. Biometrics. 2003;59:487–496. - PubMed
    1. Conaway MR, Dunbar S, Peddada SD. Designs for single- or multiple-agent phase I trials. Biometrics. 2004;60:661–669. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources